Re: cpu-x

Liste des GroupesRevenir à ol advocacy 
Sujet : Re: cpu-x
De : andrzej (at) *nospam* matu.ch (Andrzej Matuch)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date : 17. May 2024, 13:58:03
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <6647464b$0$2422121$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
User-Agent : Pan/0.146 (Hic habitat felicitas; d7a48b4 gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/pan.git)
On Fri, 17 May 2024 03:28:23 +0000, RonB wrote:

On 2024-05-16, Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> wrote:
On Wed, 15 May 2024 23:50:04 +0000, candycanearter07 wrote:
>
Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> wrote at 12:44 this Wednesday (GMT):
On Wed, 15 May 2024 03:28:23 +0000, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
[snip]
We do read open-source licences and understand them. They are
designed to be read and understood. Unlike proprietary EULAs.
 
Case in point: the question you were asking about below.
>
That's definitely a good thing. The licenses are also shorter, so
even if it were difficult to understand, reading it wouldn't take
that much time.
>
< snip >
 
 
And aren't updated as often.
>
That's a good point. The licenses users of proprietary software might
have agreed to on day one will become so different by day three that
the terms might not be so agreeable. We've all received those e-mails
from services telling us that the terms have changed. Many of those
terms have, in the past few years, become increasingly restrictive.
 
That's why I don't bother reading them, I know they're going to get more
restrictive every time. And it's also why I'm moving most of my mail
away from Yahoo and Gmail and to other providers, like Vivaldi and
Yandex — and maybe Posteo. I don't trust Google (or Yahoo) to NOT shut
down my email account if I don't toe the Woke line. Google was started
with grant money from the NSA and its CEO for several years was an
ex-CIA wonk.

I'm not sure how woke Posteo is, but I know that e-mails from Gab and
Rumble are blocked by default by their spam system. I have to change the
settings to make sure they come through. However, since all of my e-mail
is encrypted as are the contacts and address book, I have no reason to
believe they have any kind of useful access to my account. I trust that
whoever maintains their spam filter isn't conservative, but that he, she,
ze, xe or whatever else doesn't mind my circumtventing their decision.
 
No fan of Google or Yahoo anymore (unfortunately I once was). Remember
when Yahoo was the place to go when you wanted to get around the
Internet? Hopefully we'll get that point with Google in the not too
distant future. Moving their Chrome browser to Manifest 3 might be the
first chink in their armor. (We'll see. Probably not, but I can hope.)

I never much liked Yahoo or found their search engine useful. Even when it
was "the best," it was rather awful. I think I used to use altavista back
then which gave me much better results.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
6 May 24 * cpu-x250vallor
6 May 24 +* Re: cpu-x74Joel
6 May 24 i+* Re: cpu-x25vallor
6 May 24 ii`* Re: cpu-x24DFS
7 May 24 ii +* Re: cpu-x15Joel
7 May 24 ii i`* Re: cpu-x14DFS
7 May 24 ii i `* Re: cpu-x13Joel
8 May 24 ii i  `* Re: cpu-x12DFS
15 May 24 ii i   `* Re: cpu-x11Lawrence D'Oliveiro
15 May 24 ii i    `* Re: cpu-x10DFS
15 May 24 ii i     `* Re: cpu-x9vallor
15 May 24 ii i      `* Re: cpu-x8DFS
17 May 24 ii i       `* Re: cpu-x7vallor
17 May 24 ii i        `* Re: cpu-x6DFS
17 May 24 ii i         +- Re: cpu-x1vallor
17 May 24 ii i         `* Re: cpu-x4vallor
18 May 24 ii i          `* Re: cpu-x3DFS
18 May 24 ii i           `* Re: cpu-x2vallor
18 May 24 ii i            `- Re: cpu-x1DFS
7 May 24 ii +* Linux advantage: open source (was: Re: cpu-x)5vallor
8 May 24 ii i`* Re: Windows advantage: quality of applications4DFS
8 May 24 ii i `* Re: Windows advantage: quality of applications3rbowman
8 May 24 ii i  +- Re: Windows advantage: quality of applications1DFS
9 May 24 ii i  `- Re: Windows advantage: quality of applications1Chris Ahlstrom
12 May 24 ii +- Re: cpu-x1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
12 May 24 ii `* Re: cpu-x2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
14 May 24 ii  `- Re: cpu-x1candycanearter07
6 May 24 i`* Re: cpu-x48DFS
6 May 24 i `* Re: cpu-x47Joel
8 May 24 i  +- Re: cpu-x1Joel
9 May 24 i  +* Re: cpu-x3rbowman
9 May 24 i  i`* Re: cpu-x2Joel
9 May 24 i  i `- Re: cpu-x1rbowman
9 May 24 i  `* Re: cpu-x42rbowman
9 May 24 i   +* Re: cpu-x23Chris Ahlstrom
10 May 24 i   i`* Re: cpu-x22vallor
10 May 24 i   i +- Re: cpu-x1%
10 May 24 i   i +* Re: cpu-x8rbowman
10 May 24 i   i i`* Re: cpu-x7vallor
10 May 24 i   i i +- Every cult needs an apocalypse.1Relf
10 May 24 i   i i +- Re: cpu-x1vallor
10 May 24 i   i i +- Re: cpu-x1Andrzej Matuch
10 May 24 i   i i +* Re: cpu-x2Chris Ahlstrom
11 May 24 i   i i i`- Re: cpu-x1RonB
10 May 24 i   i i `- Re: cpu-x1rbowman
10 May 24 i   i `* Re: cpu-x12Chris Ahlstrom
10 May 24 i   i  +* Re: cpu-x3vallor
10 May 24 i   i  i`* Re: cpu-x2Chris Ahlstrom
11 May 24 i   i  i `- Re: cpu-x1rbowman
10 May 24 i   i  `* Re: cpu-x8RonB
10 May 24 i   i   `* Re: cpu-x7rbowman
11 May 24 i   i    +* Re: cpu-x5RonB
11 May 24 i   i    i+- Re: cpu-x1rbowman
12 May 24 i   i    i`* Re: cpu-x3RonB
12 May 24 i   i    i `* Re: cpu-x2Andrzej Matuch
12 May 24 i   i    i  `- Re: cpu-x1RonB
11 May 24 i   i    `- Re: cpu-x1Chris Ahlstrom
18 May 24 i   `* Re: cpu-x18DFS
18 May 24 i    +* Re: cpu-x10Joel
19 May 24 i    i`* Re: cpu-x9candycanearter07
19 May 24 i    i `* Re: cpu-x8Joel
19 May 24 i    i  +* Re: cpu-x2rbowman
19 May 24 i    i  i`- The almighty LLama has the final say.1Relf
24 May 24 i    i  `* Re: cpu-x5candycanearter07
24 May 24 i    i   `* Re: cpu-x4Joel
25 May 24 i    i    `* Re: cpu-x3candycanearter07
25 May 24 i    i     `* Re: cpu-x2Andrzej Matuch
25 May 24 i    i      `- Re: cpu-x1Joel
18 May 24 i    `* Re: cpu-x7rbowman
18 May 24 i     `* Re: cpu-x6DFS
19 May 24 i      `* Re: cpu-x5rbowman
19 May 24 i       +* Re: cpu-x2rbowman
19 May 24 i       i`- Re: cpu-x1Stéphane CARPENTIER
19 May 24 i       `* Re: cpu-x2Chris Ahlstrom
19 May 24 i        `- Re: cpu-x1rbowman
6 May 24 +* Re: cpu-x173Andrzej Matuch
7 May 24 i`* Re: cpu-x172DFS
7 May 24 i +* Re: cpu-x6Andrzej Matuch
7 May 24 i i+- Re: cpu-x1DFS
7 May 24 i i`* HyperV error (was: Re: cpu-x)4vallor
7 May 24 i i +* Re: HyperV error2DFS
7 May 24 i i i`- Re: HyperV error1Joel
7 May 24 i i `- Re: HyperV error1Chris Ahlstrom
8 May 24 i `* Re: cpu-x165Lawrence D'Oliveiro
8 May 24 i  `* Re: cpu-x164Andrzej Matuch
8 May 24 i   +* Re: cpu-x8Andrzej Matuch
8 May 24 i   i`* Re: cpu-x7candycanearter07
8 May 24 i   i `* Re: cpu-x6Andrzej Matuch
10 May 24 i   i  `* Re: cpu-x5Lawrence D'Oliveiro
10 May 24 i   i   +- Re: cpu-x1RonB
14 May 24 i   i   `* Re: cpu-x3candycanearter07
14 May 24 i   i    `* Re: cpu-x2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
14 May 24 i   i     `- Re: cpu-x1Andrzej Matuch
10 May 24 i   `* Re: cpu-x155Lawrence D'Oliveiro
10 May 24 i    +- Re: cpu-x1RonB
11 May 24 i    `* Re: cpu-x153DFS
12 May 24 i     +* Re: cpu-x7RonB
12 May 24 i     i`* Re: cpu-x6Andrzej Matuch
12 May 24 i     i `* Re: cpu-x5RonB
15 May 24 i     i  `* Re: cpu-x4RonB
15 May 24 i     i   `* Re: cpu-x3Andrzej Matuch
13 May 24 i     +* Re: cpu-x125Lawrence D'Oliveiro
13 May 24 i     +* Re: cpu-x16Lawrence D'Oliveiro
14 May 24 i     `* Re: cpu-x4candycanearter07
6 Jun 24 `* Re: cpu-x2vallor

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal