Sujet : Re: The "Housing Choice Voucher" ( formerly known as Section 8 ) program.
De : joelcrump (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Joel)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 18. May 2024, 01:42:40
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <jnqf4j9jqkpgninued9i1un2s67dinnlsi@4ax.com>
References : 1
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
"Relf" <
Usenet@Jeff-Relf.Me> wrote:
The "King County Housing Authority" (KCHA) runs
the "Housing Choice Voucher" ( formerly known as Section 8 ) program.
>
In King County, no landlord may reject an applicant
simply because he uses a Housing Choice Voucher.
>
With the voucher, only ~30 % of my SS check goes to rent & utilities;
the federal government pays the difference.
>
I'm on the waitlist to receive the voucher; it may take 3 years.
Unlike women & kids, the elderly are NOT prioritized.
To those who think I'm a leech on disability, I never applied for
Section 8. I've paid rent, at a steep price in Montgomery County,
Maryland, from my SS income, for a long time. I didn't want to be
beholden to the requirements. But it would've made me more well off,
financially.
-- Joel W. CrumpAmendment XIVSection 1.[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.
Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.