Re: Lawsuit filed against Red Hat for racial discrimination

DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:

On 5/8/2024 10:21 PM, Joel wrote:

Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> wrote:
 

"It's happening.  The dominoes are starting to fall.
>
In December of 2023, a number of leaks from James O'Keefe and The
Lunduke Journal were released to the public -- exposing the extreme
racial discrimination happening within both IBM and Red Hat (the world's
largest Linux company)."
>
<https://lunduke.locals.com/upost/5611162/lawsuit-filed-against-red-hat-for-racial-discrimination>

 
Clearly white nationalist propaganda, promoting the filing of a grudge
lawsuit as evidence of a conspiracy against white people.  Just
retarded.

>
Of course "DEI" is a conspiracy against Whites, especially White males.
And it's being let happen by the top corp executives, who are mostly
White males (as it should be - they're the ones who founded and
dedicated their lives to the company) that are caving in to a public
"movement".
>
All these companies pandering to DEI are desperate to hire non-White
males, for one reason only: they're not White males.
>
One of the most pathetic examples is VMWare, which pays bigger bonuses
the more non-White non-males you hire.
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
"As part of the company’s 2030 Agenda, VMware is committed to hiring 50
/ 50 women and gender non-binary / men, and to achieving the goal of
50-percent of our managers identifying as a woman, gender non-binary,
and/or from an underrepresented community by 2030."
>
https://news.vmware.com/dei/global-head-of-dei
>
>
"Senior Director-level and above now have corporate DEI goals tied to
bonus compensation."
>
https://www.vmware.com/company/esg.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
The more non-straight, non-White males you hire, the more money you make.
>
https://www.vmware.com/content/dam/digitalmarketing/vmware/en/pdf/company/vmw-eeo-report-2021.pdf
>
>
It's blatantly illegal racial and sexual discrimination.

You aren't addressing the history of white privilege, though, it's
just like the antiabortion drones I see on X/Twitter, who can't
address the rights of pregnant people, all they want to talk about is
the horror of clumps of cells being electively aborted, or how women
aren't willing to sacrifice their own lives for a failing pregnancy
(in effect), it's intellectual dishonesty, it's not a comprehensive
view of the situation.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.