Re: Système D

Le 17-05-2024, Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> a écrit :

On Fri, 17 May 2024 21:46:19 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>

 
That was purely a distro choice, to take advantage of the more robust
service-management features that systemd offers.
>

>
Another lackey, ignoramus statement.

Another great post where you are looking through a mirror.

GNU/Linux, at least on the desktop workstation, does NOT require
"services," let alone "service management."

You are confused. Once again. As your computer does nothing, it requires
nothing else than a compiler to be able to fail miserably to compile
your kernel.

But a useful workstation can be improved greatly with service
management. And systemd is very good at it.

I operate a totally potent desktop workstation and I have NO
"services."  None.  Zip.  Nada.

Yes, of course your desktop is useless, no need of service for staring
at failing compilation logs endlessly.

Thus your lackey contention is full of fucking shit.

It's the difference between looking stupidly a once computer and using
it efficiently.

Sytemd is an abomination

There are issues with systemd. Granted. But there is nothing good enough
to replace it. As you are the best programmer in pretence in the world,
you just have one thing to do: write something that does everything that
systemd is good at without his issues. And everyone will switch to it.

As systemd was created by only one guy far less good at programming than
you, you should be able to do it. Finger in the nose. During the night.
And I wonder why you didn't did it yet. Maybe you are not as good as
your claims?

and should have been strangled in the cradle.  But dupes like you have
kept it alive to wreak its destruction.

Do best and systemd will go in history books. Just brag as you only
know and it will stay on the computers. It's your choice.

--
Si vous avez du temps à perdre :
https://scarpet42.gitlab.io