Re: Système D

On 19 May 2024 16:18:01 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:

 
Not only and some softwares needs services. For the not only parts, I
want to be able to [un]plug easily a USB key/drive, a mouse, a printer, the
WiFi, well anything I didn't plugged before starting my computer.
>

Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!

I  just plug in a USB drive and then invoke my own appropriate
script:

mount-usb-ext3

mount-usb-vfat

mount-scanner

Etc., etc.

(Printer?  Only an idiot uses a printer.)

There is NO need for ridiculous services.

But YOU could not do this.  YOU are totally dependent on systemd
services.

>
for the softwares, when they run in docker, the service need to be
started. A lot of things like the logs are very well managed thanks to a
service.
 

Only a brain-dead, ignoramus retard would use "docker."

The case is closed.

 
For example I remember when a few weeks/months ago you had issues with
your ntpd service. You are the only one I know who were able to break
it. That tells a lot.
 

You are hallucinating.

I don't have or need a ntpd service.

After boot I set my clock using the commands:

openrdate -4 -v -n pool.ntp.org

hwclock --systohc --utc --noadjfile


A total ignoramus and distro lackey like you cannot understand the
methods of a Linux master like me.

>
Anything that requires 3 million lines of code to do
its job cannot be described as "good."

 
So you are publicly telling everyone here the Linux kernel cannot be
described as good. I won't say that I'm surprised because it's not the
first time you don't understand your claims.
 

My kernel does not have anywhere near 3 million locs.

My kernel is heavily customized and therefore greatly reduced in size
form stock distro kernels.

>
Yes, I know, it manages to display a useless black screen. You can be
proud of it.
>

It's the KISS principle.

KISS = Keep it simple stupid.

 
Nope. You just don't know how systemd works.
>

You don't know how Linux works.