Liste des Groupes | Revenir à ol advocacy |
On Tue, 21 May 2024 03:00:43 -0000 (UTC), RonB
<ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 2024-05-20, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:>On Mon, 20 May 2024 11:14:47 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:>
>You could, you know, read the indictments.>
They're creative, I'll say that for them.
The problem with reading the indictments is that they don't make sense. A
misdemeanor somehow being elevated to a felony in a way that's never been
done before. In other words sleazeball Democrats being extremely "creative"
(i.e. dishonest) in mishandling the law. Or, as I mentioned before, a Soviet
style show trial.
>
And now Trump can't even bring in an expert witness who specializes in the
kind of crimes they're supposedly charging Trump with. And the judge's
daughter is big fundraiser in the Democrat party? (Gee, no conflict of
interest here.)
>
No chance that, if this jury convicts, that this will stand up to an appeal.
Biden and company proving once again that they're even sleazier than the
average politician.
Despite the fact that they thought it wouldn't negatively impact Biden
in the slightest, any American with an IQ higher than 80 knows that
going after Trump is orchestrated by Biden and his administration.
That's part of why Biden's support is dwindling.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.