Sujet : Re: cpu-x
De : joelcrump (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Joel)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 24. May 2024, 20:07:12
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <6kl15j1jnr0gmd5e3tfu07nu6uqjsl7e78@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
candycanearter07 <
candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid>
wrote:
Audacious is really
better than Winamp, etc.
>
Yeah, I'm using audacious right now!
>
I always loved Winamp, and it is a great app, but there are some
things about Audacious that are really cool, the idea that one gives
up so much with Linux just doesn't really pan out. M$ Office was
never so great to me, when I found out about OO a little over 20 years
ago, I never looked back (and then LO became the current project).
>
Yeah, Audacious has a nice UI and some features are great. I also
happened to use OO on a windows computer for a while before jumping
over.
Winamp and Microsoft Office might be the mainstream, but that doesn't
mean they're actually better to use. Just as Winblows as an OS isn't
necessarily the best. I'm not interested in using it, although I do
have Edge and Skype for Linux installed, it's not like I'm anti-M$, I
just want a system that functions the best way, and Mint is ideal for
that.
-- Joel W. CrumpAmendment XIVSection 1.[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.
Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.