Liste des Groupes | Revenir à ol advocacy |
Le 24-05-2024, Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> a écrit :If that's where they head, that's fine by me. I just don't expect them to sacrifice complete control. In the end, having Linux as a kernel would mean that manufacturers like NVIDIA would have no choice but to open their drivers and that Microsoft itself wouldn't have to spend so much of their resources on ensuring that hardware works right. It would also make some of their other efforts, like Windows Defender, obsolete. Considering how Microsoft released Android phones, the chances are not so small anymore.On 2024-05-24 2:29 p.m., Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:They are using Linux to run their azure servers. What do you want? TheyLe 24-05-2024, Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> a écrit :>>>
It's part of what I was saying about Microsoft not having an interest in
replacing the Windows core with the Linux kernel. Microsoft has no
interest in using a superior kernel as long as they have one that's good
enough to offer the world which is simultaneously under their complete
control. By using Linux, they're handing over control. They won't do that.
Does it really look like Android lost control using Linux? Do you
believe Microsoft couldn't do the same? If they can reduce the costs
when keeping control, they will.
All the power to them if they do, but I just don't see the corporation
using selling something they don't have complete control over.
already do. They sell Azure, they sell Office 365. Office deployed on
personal computers is the past. It's no more where the money is. They
want the money.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.