Re: GCC > MSVC (was Re: Looks like I have to retroactively shut down that lying shithead Feeb)

Liste des GroupesRevenir à ol advocacy 
Sujet : Re: GCC > MSVC (was Re: Looks like I have to retroactively shut down that lying shithead Feeb)
De : ldo (at) *nospam* nz.invalid (Lawrence D'Oliveiro)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date : 26. May 2024, 02:53:12
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v2u15o$33nmn$4@dont-email.me>
References : 1
User-Agent : Pan/0.158 (Avdiivka; )
On Fri, 24 May 2024 10:50:50 -0400, DFS wrote:

*  The C99 standard was adopted in March 2000, so GuhNoo GCC couldn't
   have conformed to it in 1999.

It is quite common for open standards to tested in working implementations
before they are officially finalized. I think GCC is often a testbed for
this sort of thing.

*  Support for C99 was substantially complete in Visual Studio 2013

Just two years after C11 was finalized. Aren’t you proud of yourself?

Date Sujet#  Auteur
24 May 24 * Looks like I have to retroactively shut down that lying shithead Feeb4DFS
24 May 24 +- Re: Looks like I have to retroactively shut down that lying shithead Feeb1rbowman
26 May 24 `* Re: GCC > MSVC (was Re: Looks like I have to retroactively shut down that lying shithead Feeb)2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 May 24  `- Re: Looks like I have to retroactively shut down that lying shithead Feeb1DFS

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal