Liste des Groupes | Revenir à ol advocacy |
On 2024-05-25 10:29 a.m., RonB wrote:On 2024-05-25, Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> wrote:>On 2024-05-25 9:37 a.m., RonB wrote:On 2024-05-25, Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> wrote:>On 2024-05-24 8:00 p.m., RonB wrote:>On 2024-05-24, Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> wrote:>
<snip>>>
As an end-user, it should be the same to me. However, even I think that
x86-64 needs to go. Considering how far they are able to go with ARM in
terms of extending battery life, cutting power consumption and removing
the need for cooling, it only makes sense. It should especially be of
interest to hippies if they are truly concerned about society's general
energy usage.
Why not have both? I like choice.
You can have both, but the reality is that x86-64's problems are
becoming increasingly difficult to circumvent. Moving to ARM has nothing
but advantages.
I'm guessing problems with games? I don't have any problems with X86-64 on
my computers.
Battery life, power drain, high temperatures, etc..
I purposely use micro computers with low voltage CPUs and memory. Even my
laptops of choice (Ultrabooks) are designed for long battery life and low
power consumption. I do it mostly because I like less heat — I figure a
cooler running computer will last longer. I also like dislike the sound of
high speed fans. (And, for my computer usage, I don't need high specs.)
When I don't game, I want the same thing out of my computer. If the
battery life is in the ten-hour range, I'm rather happy.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.