Sujet : Re: Do Microsoft’s Copilot+ PCs Require Linux?
De : joelcrump (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Joel)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 28. May 2024, 14:58:33
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <u5lb5jlhh9djidcaodfuvq5andub431hi9@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <
ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
On Mon, 27 May 2024 15:54:47 -0400, Joel wrote:
vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
"Windows 11 Pro for Workstations 64". (I wonder what the "for
Workstations" gets you?)
That edition of Windows has a more advanced file system than NTFS.
>
You don’t mean ReFS, do you? I don’t think that’s available much any more,
outside of maybe some legacy “Enterprise” installations. Certainly not on
any off-the-shelf retail machine.
>
What else can Microsoft offer, besides NTFS? Nothing.
It is ReFS, yes:
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/business/windows-11-pro-workstations>
With resilient file system (ReFS) technology, your organization can
enjoy cloud-grade resiliency for fault-tolerant storage spaces while
managing very large volumes with ease. If one drive in your
organization becomes corrupted, your data is still protected, thanks
to mirrored drives.
<<<
-- Joel W. CrumpAmendment XIVSection 1.[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.
Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.