Sujet : Re: Do Microsoft’s Copilot+ PCs Require Linux?
De : joelcrump (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Joel)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 28. May 2024, 17:38:28
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <mfub5jl5sjf4m2rlnq7h8qtqi77nvkvv0g@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Andrzej Matuch <
andrzej@matu.ch> wrote:
On 2024-05-28 2:32 a.m., Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
Really?? That Fisher-Price toy-style UI [of WinXP] was a “good UI”?
>
In about three clicks, you could change its look so that it looked no
different than 2000.
As I already said, killfile faggot.
I was not a fan of the default interface either,
but I was a huge fan of the fact that unlike Linux at the time,
everything worked as expected.
Yeah, but WinMe sure sold copies of it for that reason, didn't it? It
should've been *free* for victims of WinMe machines.
Stop being a zealot for just a second and be objective about things. I
guarantee you that Stallman is not a messiah.
Lawrence is not the brightest guy, but you're one to talk about that,
retard.
-- Joel W. CrumpAmendment XIVSection 1.[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.
Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.