Sujet : Re: "dumb terminals" (smart phones).
De : joelcrump (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Joel)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 29. May 2024, 00:16:04
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <prlc5j5r7dalf4f53sf0ihbb5o4lq37rkt@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
DFS <
nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
On 5/28/2024 2:21 PM, Joel wrote:
"Relf" <Usenet@Jeff-Relf.Me> wrote:
rBowman: the average thin client isn't completely dumb.
>
Some of us thought "dumb terminals" (smart phones) wouldn't be popular.
My 2021 model smartphone is far more powerful than the typical Win7
computer.
>
Exactly which 2021 smartphone do you have?
Samsung Galaxy S21, what else? :)
-- Joel W. CrumpAmendment XIVSection 1.[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.
Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.