Sujet : Re: Do Microsoft?s Copilot+ PCs Require Linux?
De : joelcrump (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Joel)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 29. May 2024, 02:19:56
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <tusc5jllfskdpj5cknsk84mb5p66q0b0hc@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <
ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
On Tue, 28 May 2024 09:04:39 -0400, Joel wrote:
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
On Tue, 28 May 2024 01:55:04 -0000 (UTC), candycanearter07 wrote:
>
No, because it's [WinXP] a good UI and some stuff still works..from what I
heard.
>
Really?? That Fisher-Price toy-style UI was a “good UI”?
You could switch it to look mostly like Win2000.
>
You’re admitting that an even older UI out of the 1990s was nicer-looking
than XP?
2000's UI was a bit enhanced over 9x, actually (Me adopted 2000's
look, being released almost a year later, despite being closer to 98
in design, not a version of NT at all, although it did have 2000's
TCP/IP code, the one better thing in it compared to 98). The default
XP theme was glued on, resource-consuming, and pretty dumb looking, if
you ask me.
-- Joel W. CrumpAmendment XIVSection 1.[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.
Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.