Sujet : Re: Do Microsoft’s Copilot+ PCs Require Linux?
De : joelcrump (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Joel)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 29. May 2024, 02:21:29
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <b6tc5j59r2a7ilif79aav4cvqiatj49mcl@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <
ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
On Tue, 28 May 2024 11:38:28 -0400, Joel wrote:
Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> wrote:
Stop being a zealot for just a second and be objective about things. I
guarantee you that Stallman is not a messiah.
Lawrence is not the brightest guy, but you're one to talk about that,
retard.
>
What is this? Fractures among the ranks of the Dimdows fan(atic)s? Can’t
figure out how to present a united front against the Relentless Linux
Onslaught?
I'm no longer a fan of Winblows, although I don't *hate* it, I just
want nothing to do with it. Linux for life, until something entirely
different would in theory replace it, which I'm not holding my breath
for in my lifetime.
-- Joel W. CrumpAmendment XIVSection 1.[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.
Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.