Sujet : Re: Do Microsoft?s Copilot+ PCs Require Linux?
De : joelcrump (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Joel)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 29. May 2024, 14:35:24
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <s48e5j9c0vumf3tb69th7ie4jo9mokqqe7@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <
ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
On Tue, 28 May 2024 20:19:56 -0400, Joel wrote:
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
On Tue, 28 May 2024 09:04:39 -0400, Joel wrote:
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
On Tue, 28 May 2024 01:55:04 -0000 (UTC), candycanearter07 wrote:
>
No, because it's [WinXP] a good UI and some stuff still works..from
what I heard.
>
Really?? That Fisher-Price toy-style UI was a “good UI”?
You could switch it to look mostly like Win2000.
>
You’re admitting that an even older UI out of the 1990s was
nicer-looking than XP?
2000's UI was a bit enhanced over 9x, actually ...
>
Really?? Now you’re resorting to comparing it with even older, DOS-based
Windows to try to make it look good?
WinNT 4 was the same UI as 95, 98 was about the same, 2000 was
somewhat new, as was Me like it, and XP without the glued on BS too.
It's just a progression.
-- Joel W. CrumpAmendment XIVSection 1.[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.
Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.