Sujet : Re: Do Microsoft’s Copilot+ PCs Require Linux?
De : joelcrump (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Joel)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 29. May 2024, 19:57:33
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <o2re5jtqvolq3oj4jv4auq2aiu880daioj@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
rbowman <
bowman@montana.com> wrote:
On Wed, 29 May 2024 07:52:47 -0400, Andrzej Matuch wrote:
>
How does Cinnamon's decision to revert to looking like Windows 95 make
Linux desktop environments look good? How does XFCE continuing to poorly
imitate Windows 95 make Linux environments look good? How does almost
every desktop environment in Linux using a start button like Windows 95
demonstrate how innovate Linux developers are?
>
When you've got a good thing, stick with it. The Ubuntu 22.04 'Show
Applications' buttin is a little too metro for me.
No one has ever improved on the Win95 type of UI, that I've ever seen,
they might look "cooler", or something, but functional-wise, not
really.
-- Joel W. CrumpAmendment XIVSection 1.[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.
Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.