Liste des Groupes | Revenir à ol advocacy |
On 2024-05-30 1:45 a.m., Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:On Wed, 29 May 2024 07:50:09 -0400, Andrzej Matuch wrote:>
Moreover, the familiar one in 2000 released in 1999 _still_ looks better
than what you'll get from a Linux distribution if aesthetics are that
important to you.
You really wish that were true, don’t you? Comparing an inflexible UI
baked into a proprietary OS, with the range of customizable options
available in Open Source, and trying to say that some option from the
latter doesn’t look as good as you like, therefore none of them could be
good?
Go on, keep trying to find some standard of comparison, back and back and
back in the dim dark days of Windows, that is low enough to make XP look
good by comparison, why don’t you?
I implore you to take a screenshot of a current Linux Mint desktop and
one of a default Windows 2000 installation. Then, ask _strangers_, not
zealots like yourself who probably pray to a photo of Stallman, what
they think is prettier.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.