Liste des Groupes | Revenir à ol advocacy |
On 2024-05-29 7:48 a.m., Chris Ahlstrom wrote:Andrzej Matuch wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:>
On 2024-05-28 9:34 a.m., DFS wrote:On 5/27/2024 10:24 AM, Andrzej Matuch wrote:>On 2024-05-27 9:25 a.m., DFS wrote:>I'm sure that all Linux companies are in tears at the knowledge that>
you won't buy from them.
I engage in psychological warfare. I log to Linux sites like System76,
load up a cart with 4 maxed-out systems... then leave. It kills them!
If you bought a machine which was designed to run Linux, rather than
install Linux on a machine that originally came with Windows, you might
actually enjoy it. I know that I was a big fan of Linux on my
AMD-powered Dell laptop back in 2007-2009. I only stopped using Linux
because that laptop eventually died, and I replaced it with a Sony Vaio
which didn't seem to like the operating system at all.
My Lenovo Flex 14 works great with Linux. The first thing I did after
I bought it was slick Windows from it.
I've installed Linux on a single-core Acer (it ran Solidworks in a Windows
VM surprisingly well), a couple of Toshiba laptops, a number of Dell laptops,
a no-name laptop that came with Windows NT (Red Hat wouldn't work, a bug in K6
support, but that gave me the impetus to master Debian), an Asus "gaming"
laptop (it's now my desktop/server, always on), various name-brand and no-name
desktop boxes....
The Linuxen? Red Hat (the original); Debian Sid; Gentoo; Ubuntu; and Arch.
The main issues I encountered early in my Linux career involved needing to
build Intel wireless drivers.
For me, there is a greater chance that Linux will run fine on a machine
built for Windows than there is that Windows will run fine on a machine
built for Linux.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.