Sujet : Re: Do Microsoft?s Copilot+ PCs Require Linux?
De : ronb02NOSPAM (at) *nospam* gmail.com (RonB)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 30. May 2024, 14:02:56
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v39ptg$1lnr7$13@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
User-Agent : slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
On 2024-05-29, rbowman <
bowman@montana.com> wrote:
On Wed, 29 May 2024 15:31:56 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote:
>
I used Windows 2000. It's inferior to Cinnamon, or Mate or Xfce in my
opinion. (Of course these desktops have the advantage of running on top
of Linux.) But I can't quite understand why you run down Linux UIs that
look like the Windows' UI — what is it about Windows 2000's UI that you
think is somehow unique compared to other Windows desktops?
>
Well 2000 was better than NT 4.0, the king of BSOD.
My younger brother, who's been a Windows' programmer for a long time now,
hated to see Windows 2000 go away. I don't know anything about NT, never
used it. I guess I was using XP at that time.
-- [Self-centered, Woke] "pride is a life of self-destructive fakery, an entrapment to a false and self-created matrix of twisted unreality." "It was pride that changed angels into devils..." — St. Augustine