Liste des Groupes | Revenir à ol advocacy |
On Mon, 3 Jun 2024 15:13:35 -0000 (UTC), RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com>
wrote in <v3kmiv$3uh0e$2@dont-email.me>:
On 2024-06-03, Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> wrote:On 2024-06-02 6:09 p.m., RonB wrote:On 2024-06-02, Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> wrote:>On 2024-06-02 2:27 p.m., rbowman wrote:On Sun, 2 Jun 2024 07:50:28 -0400, Andrzej Matuch wrote:>
>I apologize to everyone but you about what I just wrote. I am>
frustrated that even in 2024 and having done research into the
right distribution for my needs, I am yet again disgusted by the
result. I love everything about Linux but the result, yet again,
is pure demoralization. To read this idiotic zealot's words and
his delusion that any of those 1990s UNIX distributions were
actually pretty simply add salt to the wound.
This is the very limited gamer distro that you tried to install?
You can always tell the pioneers by the arrows in their backs. I
regularly update Debian, Ubuntu, Lubuntu, and Fedora distros
without all that drama.
It's Fedora with tweaks. If you point to it as being bad, you might
as well point to Fedora at the same time.
That makes no sense. You can't blame Fedora for tweaks that break it.
The tweaks are specifically to make sure that anyone wanting to play
games would be able to do so. It provides easy installation for things
that will make Xbox One controllers work, help compatibility for Steam
games, and the software which will help you access your gaming library
from within Linux. Otherwise, it is just Fedora. It wasn't the tweaks
that broke anything; it's Fedora that just committed suicide.
It doesn't follow. Fedora works. Someone tweaks it and renames it as a
new distribution and it doesn't work for you. How do you blame Fedora
for that?
I'm guessing the choices made by the developers of this new
distribution worked for their machines, but not necessarily for your
machine.
Fedora 40 review:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8zsBxf48mdA
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.