Liste des Groupes | Revenir à ol advocacy |
On 2024-06-05 9:51 a.m., vallor wrote:On Wed, 5 Jun 2024 09:47:54 -0400, Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch>
wrote in <i0_7O.50063$5bN4.22016@fx17.iad>:
On 2024-06-05 9:24 a.m., vallor wrote:view>On Wed, 5 Jun 2024 08:56:04 -0400, Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch>
wrote in <IfZ7O.37104$fBCb.8660@fx11.iad>:
>On 2024-06-05 8:33 a.m., vallor wrote:On Wed, 5 Jun 2024 08:01:34 -0400, Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch>
wrote in <CsY7O.47392$Dsz1.41635@fx14.iad>:
>On 2024-06-05 7:58 a.m., Chris Ahlstrom wrote:Andrzej Matuch wrote this copyrighted missive and expects
royalties:
>On 2024-06-04 11:27 a.m., Chris Ahlstrom wrote:>Andrzej Matuch wrote this copyrighted missive and expects>
royalties:
>Either way, every one of these distributions behave like a>
"one-man hobby project that had zero third-party testing." I
don't know why I even bother anymore.
Door, meet AM's ass! :-)
Does it bother you to know that when leftists are injected with
testosterone, they start to lean right?
:-D
><https://www.openicpsr.org/openicpsr/project/155441/version/V1/>>>>>>
Testosterone Administration Induces A Red Shift in
Democrats
>
LMAO Read the abstract; funny as hell
>
Does it bother you than when men age (and also presumably start
getting low testosterone), they start to lurch right?
>
:-D
Has your lack of testosterone taken your reading ability?
>
"When weakly affiliated Democrats received additional
testosterone,
the strength of their party fell by 12% (p=.01) and they reported
45%
warmer feelings towards Republican candidates for president (p <
0.001). Our results demonstrate that testosterone induces a “red
shift" among weakly-affiliated Democrats."
>>Anyway, I'll leave you to your one-man projects. I'm done losing>
time and data.
Sorry you have so much trouble with your Linux computer(s). In
the meantime,
it works fine for my projects. Makes you wonder where lies the
problem.
Maybe I need to be injected with estrogen.
Not necessary.
>
You simply need to pray to our Heavenly Father, who art in Heaven,
and ask Him why He hates you.
I think you have that in reverse. My Father does not want me to lose
my data because some language file needs updating, and does not want
me to suffer with software whose features don't actually work.
Perhaps Windows doesn't work for you because God thinks you need to
lose a few.
>
If you were expecting a courteous answer, I would suggest you not
mock God.
I didn't "mock God" -- I mocked YOU, snowflake.
>
I guess I should have added a smiley...on the other hand, you have
been acting like a perfectly stinking and entitled jackass,
and you deserve to get zinged for it.
>
But if it bothers you that much -- sure, try the estrogen.
I'm entitled because I expect Linux to actually work after three
decades of development? Stupid me!
But you're blaming "Linux" for a failure in _Lutris_.
That's like blaming Windows for a failure in _Photoshop_.
Do you see?
I also mentioned that before even installing the distribution, the
latest ISO available on the web site, it:
1) told me that it was no longer supported before even getting into the
test environment.
2) didn't detect my keyboard change in the installation process,
behaving like a US keyboard despite the fact that it was set to Canadian
French 3) required an update the moment it was installed requiring a
restart, then refused to boot into the desktop 4) after rescue and
NVIDIA installation using their instructions, again refused to boot into
the system requiring a rescue 5) wouldn't play the video part of a video
file using VLC whether it be the proper package or the Flatpak unless
the NVIDIA drivers were uninstalled. With them installed, only Dragon
Player worked alright 6) asked me to install an update right after it
had already installed updates 7) asked me to use a GPG key for keychain
encryption then disregarded the fact that it had been installed using
the GPG command in the terminal
That is all on day _one_ and before even bothering with Lutris. Which
part of that list suggests that Linux works well?
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.