Sujet : Re: Workstation Aesthetics
De : joelcrump (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Joel)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 06. Jun 2024, 06:05:41
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <88d26jhbvmid8cojpcactfjfot6idbbdf6@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
DFS <
nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
On 6/4/2024 7:36 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>
Remember, the big advance in Windows 95 was in actually having a “Start”
menu for the first time.
>
Another feature for bereft-of-ideas GuhNoo/FOSS copycats to clone.
Heh, you know I have a great refute for that, which *doesn't* even
involve Linux, right? You guessed it, Win8.x, for which Classic
Shell, open source, provided a free and fully functional start
replacement. I know, there was a paid app too, but why would I want
it, when Classic Shell was so great and configurable? Face it, you
want everything in FOSS to be "GuhNoo", and it just isn't so.
-- Joel W. CrumpAmendment XIVSection 1.[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.
Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.