Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge (was: C Programming Challenge)

Liste des GroupesRevenir à ol advocacy 
Sujet : Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge (was: C Programming Challenge)
De : vallor (at) *nospam* cultnix.org (vallor)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date : 16. Jun 2024, 10:19:11
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <ld7lfuF433iU2@mid.individual.net>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Pan/0.159 (Vovchansk; 764d7cd; Linux-6.9.4)
On Jun 15, 2024 at 3:20:19 PM EDT, "Farley Flud" <ff@linux.rocks> wrote:
 
On Sat, 15 Jun 2024 14:29:04 +0000, Farley Flud wrote:
 
 
Write a C program to compute the subfactorial of an integer N.
 
 
Nobody got it (as predicted).
 
Because no one bothered.

I actually took the opportunity to install the GMP documentation
on my system, look up what a "subfactorial" is, and do
an implementation that works for !N where N is 0 through 50.

Furled Fart lost the opportunity to show his prowess with
the GMP library by not demonstrating use of gmp_printf().

This is all trivial stuff.  These math "problems" have already been
solved multiple times.  That you think this is a "programming challenge"
just shows how utterly clueless you are.

It's more of a "let's learn libgmp" challenge, which is a library
that he already has familiarity with.  I don't think he learned anything.
And it's not that difficult a library to use.

Hint: people were doing this 60 years ago on mainframes using Fortran.
That you have only now discovered this proves AGAIN how utterly clueless
you are.
 
 
What's next? Compute Pi to a million decimal places? That also has
already been done many times. Sounds like another great "programming
challenge" for your feeble brain.

$ time ./try_mpz
0:1
1:0
2:1
3:2
4:9
5:44
[...]
49:223774392215649610092605161415154686480227084177314431854406736
50:11188719610782480504630258070757734324011354208865721592720336801

real 0m0.002s
user 0m0.001s
sys 0m0.001s

I also was interested in the recursive version.  Here's the
run with N=50 with long long int's, which gives the wrong answer
due to overflow:

$ time ./try2
7531320031745615777

real 0m35.541s
user 0m35.530s
sys 0m0.001s

So: don't bother with the recursive version, except as
a pedantic exercize.

*Do* use GMP if you ever need to work with big numbers...
maybe numpy in Python can do the same thing, I wouldn't
know about that.

$ ll /usr/share/doc/gmp-doc/gmp.pdf.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 812615 Nov 16  2020 /usr/share/doc/gmp-doc/
gmp.pdf.gz

$ grep FLAGS Makefile
CFLAGS=-Wall -O3 -g -Wpedantic

--
-v System76 Thelio Mega v1.1 x86_64 NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti
   OS: Linux 6.9.4 Release: Mint 21.3 Mem: 258G
   "Unrecoverable Error #666: Armegeddon in 30..29..28..27.."

Date Sujet#  Auteur
15 Jun 24 * C Programming Challenge69Farley Flud
15 Jun 24 +* Re: Another Feeb Fail. Poseurs Indeed. (was: C Programming Challenge)4Tyrone
15 Jun 24 i`* Re: Another Feeb Fail. Poseurs Indeed. (was: C Programming Challenge)3Diego Garcia
16 Jun 24 i +- Re: Another Feeb Fail. Poseurs Indeed. (was: C Programming Challenge)1candycanearter07
16 Jun 24 i `- Re: Another Feeb Fail. Poseurs Indeed.1DFS
15 Jun 24 +* Re: C Programming Challenge2Chris Ahlstrom
15 Jun 24 i`- Re: C Programming Challenge1Joel
15 Jun 24 `* Re: C Programming Challenge62Farley Flud
16 Jun 24  +* Re: C Programming Challenge2Farley Flud
16 Jun 24  i`- Re: C Programming Challenge1Stéphane CARPENTIER
16 Jun 24  `* Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge (was: C Programming Challenge)59Tyrone
16 Jun 24   +* Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge (was: C Programming Challenge)56vallor
16 Jun 24   i+- Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge (was: C Programming Challenge)1vallor
16 Jun 24   i`* Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge54DFS
17 Jun 24   i `* Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge53vallor
17 Jun 24   i  +* Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge37%
17 Jun 24   i  i+* Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge2vallor
17 Jun 24   i  ii`- Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge1%
17 Jun 24   i  i`* Fine. (was: Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge)34vallor
17 Jun 24   i  i `* Re: Fine. (was: Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge)33Joel
18 Jun 24   i  i  `* Re: Fine. (was: Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge)32vallor
18 Jun 24   i  i   `* Re: Fine. (was: Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge)31Farley Flud
18 Jun 24   i  i    +* Re: Fine. (was: Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge)29vallor
19 Jun 24   i  i    i+* Re: Fine.25%
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii`* Re: Fine.24vallor
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii +- Re: Fine.1%
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii +* Re: Fine.20%
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii i+* Re: Fine.9vallor
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii ii+* Re: Fine.7Joel
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii iii+* Re: Fine.2vallor
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii iiii`- Re: Fine.1Chris Ahlstrom
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii iii+- Re: Fine.1Joel
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii iii+- Re: Fine.1rbowman
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii iii`* Re: Fine.2vallor
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii iii `- Re: Fine.1%
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii ii`- Re: Fine.1%
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii i+* Re: Fine.7Joel
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii ii`* Re: Fine.6%
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii ii `* Re: Fine.5vallor
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii ii  `* Re: Fine.4%
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii ii   `* Re: Fine.3vallor
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii ii    `* Re: Fine.2%
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii ii     `- Re: Fine.1%
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii i+- Re: Fine.1%
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii i+- Re: Fine.1Joel
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii i`- Re: Fine.1rbowman
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii +- Re: Fine.1Chris Ahlstrom
20 Jun 24   i  i    ii `- Re: Fine.1vallor
19 Jun 24   i  i    i`* Re: Fine. (was: Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge)3Farley Flud
19 Jun 24   i  i    i `* Re: Fine.2vallor
19 Jun 24   i  i    i  `- Re: Fine.1Chris Ahlstrom
22 Jun 24   i  i    `- Re: Fine. (was: Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge)1Stéphane CARPENTIER
17 Jun 24   i  +* Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge2DFS
17 Jun 24   i  i`- Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge1vallor
17 Jun 24   i  +- Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge1Farley Flud
18 Jun 24   i  `* Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge12DFS
19 Jun 24   i   `* Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge11vallor
19 Jun 24   i    +- Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge1%
19 Jun 24   i    +* Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge6Farley Flud
19 Jun 24   i    i+- Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge1Chris Ahlstrom
20 Jun 24   i    i`* Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge4candycanearter07
22 Jun 24   i    i `* Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge3Stéphane CARPENTIER
23 Jun 24   i    i  `* Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge2candycanearter07
23 Jun 24   i    i   `- Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge1Stéphane CARPENTIER
19 Jun 24   i    +- [OT] Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge1vallor
19 Jun 24   i    +- Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge1rbowman
20 Jun 24   i    `- Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge1candycanearter07
16 Jun 24   `* Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge (was: C Programming Challenge)2rbowman
16 Jun 24    `- Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge1Tyrone

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal