Re: Fine.

Liste des GroupesRevenir à ol advocacy 
Sujet : Re: Fine.
De : pursent100 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (%)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date : 19. Jun 2024, 03:03:46
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <1eydnaXICYPvs-_7nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@giganews.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/91.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2
vallor wrote:
On Tue, 18 Jun 2024 15:11:50 -0700, % <pursent100@gmail.com> wrote in
<jAednegtV726m-_7nZ2dnZfqnPqdnZ2d@giganews.com>:
 
vallor wrote:
On Mon, 17 Jun 2024 22:44:05 +0000, Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> wrote
in <17d9ec069a174a11$93819$3210899$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com>:
>
On 17 Jun 2024 22:14:24 GMT, vallor wrote:
>
>
What I would like to do is someday figure out how to build with
-march=native .  Haven't bothered yet, because my machine is already
plenty fast.
>
>
I don't think that it is possible to pass custom CFLAGS to the kernel
build.
>
Whatever, Sport.
>
$ rcsdiff -u Makefile
===================================================================
RCS file: RCS/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.1 diff -u -r1.1 Makefile
--- Makefile 2024/06/16 11:51:16 1.1 +++ Makefile 2024/06/17
23:36:50
@@ -808,7 +808,7 @@
   KBUILD_CFLAGS += -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks
      ifdef CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_PERFORMANCE
-KBUILD_CFLAGS += -O2 +KBUILD_CFLAGS += -O3 -march=native
   KBUILD_RUSTFLAGS += -Copt-level=2 else ifdef
   CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE KBUILD_CFLAGS += -Os
>
>
off topic
 nope
 Posting with a Linux optimized beyond the defaults
is very on-topic, since you CAN'T DO THAT WITH WINDERS(!).
 
too late you are

Date Sujet#  Auteur
15 Jun 24 * C Programming Challenge69Farley Flud
15 Jun 24 +* Re: Another Feeb Fail. Poseurs Indeed. (was: C Programming Challenge)4Tyrone
15 Jun 24 i`* Re: Another Feeb Fail. Poseurs Indeed. (was: C Programming Challenge)3Diego Garcia
16 Jun 24 i +- Re: Another Feeb Fail. Poseurs Indeed. (was: C Programming Challenge)1candycanearter07
16 Jun 24 i `- Re: Another Feeb Fail. Poseurs Indeed.1DFS
15 Jun 24 +* Re: C Programming Challenge2Chris Ahlstrom
15 Jun 24 i`- Re: C Programming Challenge1Joel
15 Jun 24 `* Re: C Programming Challenge62Farley Flud
16 Jun 24  +* Re: C Programming Challenge2Farley Flud
16 Jun 24  i`- Re: C Programming Challenge1Stéphane CARPENTIER
16 Jun 24  `* Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge (was: C Programming Challenge)59Tyrone
16 Jun 24   +* Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge (was: C Programming Challenge)56vallor
16 Jun 24   i+- Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge (was: C Programming Challenge)1vallor
16 Jun 24   i`* Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge54DFS
17 Jun 24   i `* Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge53vallor
17 Jun 24   i  +* Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge37%
17 Jun 24   i  i+* Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge2vallor
17 Jun 24   i  ii`- Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge1%
17 Jun 24   i  i`* Fine. (was: Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge)34vallor
17 Jun 24   i  i `* Re: Fine. (was: Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge)33Joel
18 Jun 24   i  i  `* Re: Fine. (was: Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge)32vallor
18 Jun 24   i  i   `* Re: Fine. (was: Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge)31Farley Flud
18 Jun 24   i  i    +* Re: Fine. (was: Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge)29vallor
19 Jun 24   i  i    i+* Re: Fine.25%
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii`* Re: Fine.24vallor
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii +- Re: Fine.1%
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii +* Re: Fine.20%
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii i+* Re: Fine.9vallor
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii ii+* Re: Fine.7Joel
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii iii+* Re: Fine.2vallor
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii iiii`- Re: Fine.1Chris Ahlstrom
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii iii+- Re: Fine.1Joel
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii iii+- Re: Fine.1rbowman
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii iii`* Re: Fine.2vallor
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii iii `- Re: Fine.1%
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii ii`- Re: Fine.1%
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii i+* Re: Fine.7Joel
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii ii`* Re: Fine.6%
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii ii `* Re: Fine.5vallor
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii ii  `* Re: Fine.4%
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii ii   `* Re: Fine.3vallor
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii ii    `* Re: Fine.2%
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii ii     `- Re: Fine.1%
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii i+- Re: Fine.1%
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii i+- Re: Fine.1Joel
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii i`- Re: Fine.1rbowman
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii +- Re: Fine.1Chris Ahlstrom
20 Jun 24   i  i    ii `- Re: Fine.1vallor
19 Jun 24   i  i    i`* Re: Fine. (was: Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge)3Farley Flud
19 Jun 24   i  i    i `* Re: Fine.2vallor
19 Jun 24   i  i    i  `- Re: Fine.1Chris Ahlstrom
22 Jun 24   i  i    `- Re: Fine. (was: Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge)1Stéphane CARPENTIER
17 Jun 24   i  +* Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge2DFS
17 Jun 24   i  i`- Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge1vallor
17 Jun 24   i  +- Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge1Farley Flud
18 Jun 24   i  `* Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge12DFS
19 Jun 24   i   `* Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge11vallor
19 Jun 24   i    +- Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge1%
19 Jun 24   i    +* Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge6Farley Flud
19 Jun 24   i    i+- Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge1Chris Ahlstrom
20 Jun 24   i    i`* Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge4candycanearter07
22 Jun 24   i    i `* Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge3Stéphane CARPENTIER
23 Jun 24   i    i  `* Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge2candycanearter07
23 Jun 24   i    i   `- Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge1Stéphane CARPENTIER
19 Jun 24   i    +- [OT] Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge1vallor
19 Jun 24   i    +- Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge1rbowman
20 Jun 24   i    `- Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge1candycanearter07
16 Jun 24   `* Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge (was: C Programming Challenge)2rbowman
16 Jun 24    `- Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge1Tyrone

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal