Re: Fine.

Liste des GroupesRevenir à ol advocacy 
Sujet : Re: Fine.
De : joelcrump (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Joel)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date : 19. Jun 2024, 18:07:19
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <ld067j5ch3kekpsq9qg4hablric1r3nvto@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
Andrzej Matuch wrote:
>
To most people, Windows is indeed free since it came with their machine.
It only costs something to people who are building a machine from scratch.
>
WinDOS is very inexpensive because Microshaft is raping your privacy.
>
If you think it's bad now, wait until all the motherboards have an
"AI" chip on them.  They are coming soon.  This will enable the M$
"Copilot" AI to analyse everything on your system, and everything that
you're doing with it, and report back to M$ (or to the government).


Copilot is an example of why I'd never go back to Windows, even on a
new machine, just always trying to think for the user, call me old
fashioned but I'm capable of using ChatGPT independently of the
fuckin' OS, if I even wanted it in the first place, which I don't.
Linux is virtually *altogether* advantageous, to me, almost nothing at
all is sacrificed to abstain from Windows.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
15 Jun 24 * C Programming Challenge69Farley Flud
15 Jun 24 +* Re: Another Feeb Fail. Poseurs Indeed. (was: C Programming Challenge)4Tyrone
15 Jun 24 i`* Re: Another Feeb Fail. Poseurs Indeed. (was: C Programming Challenge)3Diego Garcia
16 Jun 24 i +- Re: Another Feeb Fail. Poseurs Indeed. (was: C Programming Challenge)1candycanearter07
16 Jun 24 i `- Re: Another Feeb Fail. Poseurs Indeed.1DFS
15 Jun 24 +* Re: C Programming Challenge2Chris Ahlstrom
15 Jun 24 i`- Re: C Programming Challenge1Joel
15 Jun 24 `* Re: C Programming Challenge62Farley Flud
16 Jun 24  +* Re: C Programming Challenge2Farley Flud
16 Jun 24  i`- Re: C Programming Challenge1Stéphane CARPENTIER
16 Jun 24  `* Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge (was: C Programming Challenge)59Tyrone
16 Jun 24   +* Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge (was: C Programming Challenge)56vallor
16 Jun 24   i+- Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge (was: C Programming Challenge)1vallor
16 Jun 24   i`* Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge54DFS
17 Jun 24   i `* Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge53vallor
17 Jun 24   i  +* Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge37%
17 Jun 24   i  i+* Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge2vallor
17 Jun 24   i  ii`- Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge1%
17 Jun 24   i  i`* Fine. (was: Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge)34vallor
17 Jun 24   i  i `* Re: Fine. (was: Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge)33Joel
18 Jun 24   i  i  `* Re: Fine. (was: Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge)32vallor
18 Jun 24   i  i   `* Re: Fine. (was: Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge)31Farley Flud
18 Jun 24   i  i    +* Re: Fine. (was: Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge)29vallor
19 Jun 24   i  i    i+* Re: Fine.25%
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii`* Re: Fine.24vallor
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii +- Re: Fine.1%
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii +* Re: Fine.20%
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii i+* Re: Fine.9vallor
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii ii+* Re: Fine.7Joel
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii iii+* Re: Fine.2vallor
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii iiii`- Re: Fine.1Chris Ahlstrom
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii iii+- Re: Fine.1Joel
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii iii+- Re: Fine.1rbowman
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii iii`* Re: Fine.2vallor
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii iii `- Re: Fine.1%
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii ii`- Re: Fine.1%
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii i+* Re: Fine.7Joel
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii ii`* Re: Fine.6%
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii ii `* Re: Fine.5vallor
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii ii  `* Re: Fine.4%
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii ii   `* Re: Fine.3vallor
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii ii    `* Re: Fine.2%
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii ii     `- Re: Fine.1%
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii i+- Re: Fine.1%
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii i+- Re: Fine.1Joel
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii i`- Re: Fine.1rbowman
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii +- Re: Fine.1Chris Ahlstrom
20 Jun 24   i  i    ii `- Re: Fine.1vallor
19 Jun 24   i  i    i`* Re: Fine. (was: Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge)3Farley Flud
19 Jun 24   i  i    i `* Re: Fine.2vallor
19 Jun 24   i  i    i  `- Re: Fine.1Chris Ahlstrom
22 Jun 24   i  i    `- Re: Fine. (was: Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge)1Stéphane CARPENTIER
17 Jun 24   i  +* Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge2DFS
17 Jun 24   i  i`- Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge1vallor
17 Jun 24   i  +- Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge1Farley Flud
18 Jun 24   i  `* Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge12DFS
19 Jun 24   i   `* Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge11vallor
19 Jun 24   i    +- Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge1%
19 Jun 24   i    +* Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge6Farley Flud
19 Jun 24   i    i+- Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge1Chris Ahlstrom
20 Jun 24   i    i`* Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge4candycanearter07
22 Jun 24   i    i `* Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge3Stéphane CARPENTIER
23 Jun 24   i    i  `* Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge2candycanearter07
23 Jun 24   i    i   `- Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge1Stéphane CARPENTIER
19 Jun 24   i    +- [OT] Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge1vallor
19 Jun 24   i    +- Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge1rbowman
20 Jun 24   i    `- Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge1candycanearter07
16 Jun 24   `* Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge (was: C Programming Challenge)2rbowman
16 Jun 24    `- Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge1Tyrone

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal