Re: Fine.

Liste des GroupesRevenir à ol advocacy 
Sujet : Re: Fine.
De : vallor (at) *nospam* cultnix.org (vallor)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date : 20. Jun 2024, 03:51:01
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <ldhg85Fn9s2U6@mid.individual.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
User-Agent : Pan/0.159 (Vovchansk; 873418b; Linux-6.9.5)
On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 08:32:31 -0400, DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote in
<6672cfdc$0$2422109$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:

On 6/18/2024 7:04 PM, vallor wrote:
 
 
Posting with a Linux optimized beyond the defaults is very on-topic,
since you CAN'T DO THAT WITH WINDERS(!).
 
 
Why do you have to turn it up to 11?  What was wrong with 10?

Because 11 is faster than 10.  Vroom!

(Actually, truth be told, I can't tell the difference.)

What was wrong with the kernel you had in March, that you've already
replaced 3 or 4 times?

It's not the latest from Linus.

Why are you so dissatisfied with Linux that you have to constantly
update it?

"Have you stopped beating your wife?"

Seriously though, I'm not "dissatisfied" with it,
just seeing how the newest stable kernel compiles and runs.

Who knows?  I might spot another bug and once again, contribute
to Linux.

BTW: since I can't really tell any difference between the "-O2" and
"-O3 -march=native" kernels, I'm probably not going to do that
trick for the next iteration.

Aliens movie    : "Let's rock!!!"
 
GuhNoo adherents: "Let's tinker!!!"

Cute, but that makes no sense in this context.

--
-v System76 Thelio Mega v1.1 x86_64 NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti
   OS: Linux 6.9.5tweaked Release: Mint 21.3 Mem: 258G
   "Half the lies they tell me aren't true. --Yogi Berra"

Date Sujet#  Auteur
15 Jun 24 * C Programming Challenge69Farley Flud
15 Jun 24 +* Re: Another Feeb Fail. Poseurs Indeed. (was: C Programming Challenge)4Tyrone
15 Jun 24 i`* Re: Another Feeb Fail. Poseurs Indeed. (was: C Programming Challenge)3Diego Garcia
16 Jun 24 i +- Re: Another Feeb Fail. Poseurs Indeed. (was: C Programming Challenge)1candycanearter07
16 Jun 24 i `- Re: Another Feeb Fail. Poseurs Indeed.1DFS
15 Jun 24 +* Re: C Programming Challenge2Chris Ahlstrom
15 Jun 24 i`- Re: C Programming Challenge1Joel
15 Jun 24 `* Re: C Programming Challenge62Farley Flud
16 Jun 24  +* Re: C Programming Challenge2Farley Flud
16 Jun 24  i`- Re: C Programming Challenge1Stéphane CARPENTIER
16 Jun 24  `* Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge (was: C Programming Challenge)59Tyrone
16 Jun 24   +* Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge (was: C Programming Challenge)56vallor
16 Jun 24   i+- Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge (was: C Programming Challenge)1vallor
16 Jun 24   i`* Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge54DFS
17 Jun 24   i `* Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge53vallor
17 Jun 24   i  +* Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge37%
17 Jun 24   i  i+* Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge2vallor
17 Jun 24   i  ii`- Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge1%
17 Jun 24   i  i`* Fine. (was: Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge)34vallor
17 Jun 24   i  i `* Re: Fine. (was: Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge)33Joel
18 Jun 24   i  i  `* Re: Fine. (was: Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge)32vallor
18 Jun 24   i  i   `* Re: Fine. (was: Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge)31Farley Flud
18 Jun 24   i  i    +* Re: Fine. (was: Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge)29vallor
19 Jun 24   i  i    i+* Re: Fine.25%
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii`* Re: Fine.24vallor
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii +- Re: Fine.1%
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii +* Re: Fine.20%
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii i+* Re: Fine.9vallor
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii ii+* Re: Fine.7Joel
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii iii+* Re: Fine.2vallor
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii iiii`- Re: Fine.1Chris Ahlstrom
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii iii+- Re: Fine.1Joel
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii iii+- Re: Fine.1rbowman
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii iii`* Re: Fine.2vallor
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii iii `- Re: Fine.1%
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii ii`- Re: Fine.1%
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii i+* Re: Fine.7Joel
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii ii`* Re: Fine.6%
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii ii `* Re: Fine.5vallor
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii ii  `* Re: Fine.4%
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii ii   `* Re: Fine.3vallor
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii ii    `* Re: Fine.2%
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii ii     `- Re: Fine.1%
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii i+- Re: Fine.1%
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii i+- Re: Fine.1Joel
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii i`- Re: Fine.1rbowman
19 Jun 24   i  i    ii +- Re: Fine.1Chris Ahlstrom
20 Jun 24   i  i    ii `- Re: Fine.1vallor
19 Jun 24   i  i    i`* Re: Fine. (was: Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge)3Farley Flud
19 Jun 24   i  i    i `* Re: Fine.2vallor
19 Jun 24   i  i    i  `- Re: Fine.1Chris Ahlstrom
22 Jun 24   i  i    `- Re: Fine. (was: Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge)1Stéphane CARPENTIER
17 Jun 24   i  +* Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge2DFS
17 Jun 24   i  i`- Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge1vallor
17 Jun 24   i  +- Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge1Farley Flud
18 Jun 24   i  `* Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge12DFS
19 Jun 24   i   `* Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge11vallor
19 Jun 24   i    +- Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge1%
19 Jun 24   i    +* Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge6Farley Flud
19 Jun 24   i    i+- Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge1Chris Ahlstrom
20 Jun 24   i    i`* Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge4candycanearter07
22 Jun 24   i    i `* Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge3Stéphane CARPENTIER
23 Jun 24   i    i  `* Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge2candycanearter07
23 Jun 24   i    i   `- Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge1Stéphane CARPENTIER
19 Jun 24   i    +- [OT] Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge1vallor
19 Jun 24   i    +- Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge1rbowman
20 Jun 24   i    `- Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge1candycanearter07
16 Jun 24   `* Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge (was: C Programming Challenge)2rbowman
16 Jun 24    `- Re: C Non-Programming Non-Challenge1Tyrone

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal