Sujet : Re: Slimer: no more Windows for me... and this time I mean it! (was Re: Heroic Game Launcher... BRAVO!)
De : joelcrump (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Joel)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 25. Jun 2024, 05:18:30
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <qldk7jh24nv6fnhg8lnr531q4tero2kgt9@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
DFS <
nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
On 6/24/2024 7:14 PM, Andrzej Matuch wrote:
On 2024-06-24 19:02, Joel wrote:
>
To be honest, it's kind of unbelievable how just in the time of
Win11's being current, we've seen this manifest. I liked Win11 when I
first used it. I would *never* *think* of going back to M$, now.
Linux or death.
I can only hope that I'll have the same kind of strength for myself. I
regretfully often "forget" why it becomes necessary for me to leave
Windows. Each time, I tell myself that the unethical behaviour is not as
bad as I thought or whatever. In the end, it almost always turns out to
be worse than I even imagined. Anyway, I've managed to set up Linux Mint
the way I want it to be with asusctl working and my games running as
expected. I no longer have access to my Microsoft movie collection, but
that's fine. I imagine that it's a matter of time before they make those
movies available through the web anyway. If they don't, fine... they're
accessible through my Xbox Series S. I won't install an operating system
which is most likely spying on everything I do just to have access to a
library of movies I never watch.
>
heh! Here we go again!
I believe him, this time, though. He's making a very valid point,
that commercial software is going in a novel direction. Linux may
quickly become the only choice, for someone who remembers the wild
west Internet.
-- Joel W. CrumpAmendment XIVSection 1.[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.
Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.