Re: Microsoft: one step forward, one step back

Liste des GroupesRevenir à ol advocacy 
Sujet : Re: Microsoft: one step forward, one step back
De : joelcrump (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Joel)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date : 27. Jun 2024, 01:51:57
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <rbap7j1o7jfd05sksob46o5d1gjl2sfama@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:

Laptops are an enigma to me, yeah, I see why one would want it, to sit
on the couch with a real computer, but it's just undoable for me, I can
use my phone as a portable computer, but for real work I need my desk
and monitor/keyboard/etc.  So yeah, if I thought about getting a laptop,
the MacBook models are a nice option, having the non-Intel/AMD stuff,
but that's beginning to be available in PC models as well, so as long as
I could boot Linux, that'd be the choice.
>
You don't travel much, do you? At home my laptop is plugged into the KVM
along with the other computers but when I'm on the road it serves. I do
usually carry one of those little mice. I hate trackpads and all their
relatives.


I guess it would be alright to have for traveling, although more of a
burden to carry than my phone.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
26 Jun21:29 * Re: Microsoft: one step forward, one step back10Joel
26 Jun22:20 `* Re: Microsoft: one step forward, one step back9Joel
27 Jun01:44  `* Re: Microsoft: one step forward, one step back8rbowman
27 Jun01:51   `* Re: Microsoft: one step forward, one step back7Joel
27 Jun06:30    `* Re: Microsoft: one step forward, one step back6rbowman
27 Jun06:44     `* Re: Microsoft: one step forward, one step back5Joel
27 Jun09:09      `* Re: Microsoft: one step forward, one step back4rbowman
30 Jun16:10       `* Re: Microsoft: one step forward, one step back3candycanearter07
1 Jul17:20        `* Re: Microsoft: one step forward, one step back2candycanearter07
2 Jul16:00         `- Re: Microsoft: one step forward, one step back1candycanearter07

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal