Sujet : Re: Is Windows-on-ARM On Its Last Legs?
De : joelcrump (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Joel)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 27. Jun 2024, 02:07:33
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <67bp7jpbbnqf4aqnk60hvkl6uon1gmcug0@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <
ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
Why would you expect Intel/AMD CPUs to last much longer?
>
Certainly the Windows market is unable to move away from them.
Why? They have Winblows on ARM, apps can be compiled for it or
emulated.
>
But Microsoft cannot offer a compelling value proposition for moving to
such machines.
Sure they can, it's efficient, as Andrzej says battery life for
laptops, but even as a desktop user, I'd like something without the
fan noise, using less electricity. I wouldn't want to run Windows, of
course, but Linux can be booted on an ARM device, too.
-- Joel W. CrumpAmendment XIVSection 1.[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.
Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.