Re: Is Windows-on-ARM On Its Last Legs?

Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:

Why would you expect Intel/AMD CPUs to last much longer?

>
Certainly the Windows market is unable to move away from them.

 
Why?  They have Winblows on ARM, apps can be compiled for it or
emulated.

>
But Microsoft cannot offer a compelling value proposition for moving to
such machines.

 
Sure they can, it's efficient ...

>
Only when running ARM-native code. Otherwise the x86 emulator drags
performance down. And that still applies to the vast majority of Windows
apps.

>
Read the entire post I wrote, dummy.

Actually, it wasn't even due to your unnecessary snipping, it's
earlier in the quoting you left in, "can be compiled for it".  Either
way, comprehend first.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.