Re: Microsoft: one step forward, one step back

Liste des GroupesRevenir à ol advocacy 
Sujet : Re: Microsoft: one step forward, one step back
De : joelcrump (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Joel)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date : 27. Jun 2024, 06:44:24
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <iarp7j9a3qr2s9dv39ool4cuset487ttta@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:

I guess it would be alright to have for traveling, although more of a
burden to carry than my phone.
>
I don't think there is a VS Code version for my Android phone, let alone a
C compiler or Python 3.12 install.
>
About all I use the phone for is Slack, a geocaching app, the Fitbit app,
and a step counter. Oh, yeah, as a receiver for the stupid 2FA pins.


My work can largely be done with a phone, but it's still nice to have
the Linux box when I'm settled at home, at my desk.  A laptop would be
useful when traveling for multiple days, but one more thing to keep
track of as I was doing so.  It's hard to say that I'd really need it,
I was able to post to Usenet with a phone app, on my vacation,
certainly not as good as a computer, but it goes to show it can be
done.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
26 Jun21:29 * Re: Microsoft: one step forward, one step back10Joel
26 Jun22:20 `* Re: Microsoft: one step forward, one step back9Joel
27 Jun01:44  `* Re: Microsoft: one step forward, one step back8rbowman
27 Jun01:51   `* Re: Microsoft: one step forward, one step back7Joel
27 Jun06:30    `* Re: Microsoft: one step forward, one step back6rbowman
27 Jun06:44     `* Re: Microsoft: one step forward, one step back5Joel
27 Jun09:09      `* Re: Microsoft: one step forward, one step back4rbowman
30 Jun16:10       `* Re: Microsoft: one step forward, one step back3candycanearter07
1 Jul17:20        `* Re: Microsoft: one step forward, one step back2candycanearter07
2 Jul16:00         `- Re: Microsoft: one step forward, one step back1candycanearter07

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal