Liste des Groupes | Revenir à ol advocacy |
On 2024-06-29, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:RonB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:>
>On 2024-06-28, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:>RonB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:>
>On 2024-06-27, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:>rbowman wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:>
>On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 14:33:43 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote:>
>Then the "Big Bang" didn't create the universe? (It's hard to keep track
of the latest dogma in these cultish religions.)
:-D Physics = cultish religion. How fscking ridiculous!
>Yeah, it's hard to tell which direction Francis will head in next.>
I guess it's a lot easier to believe that God had a Big Bang than
that an eternal universe eventually became a singularity and then
exploded to start the next cycle of universe generation.
Try visualizing eternity.
I just did!
And what did you see?
An endless sequence of expanding strings. ;->
>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_First_Three_Minutes
>
Early in the book, Weinberg explores the origins and implications of the
Hubble constant, that the red shift of galaxies is proportional to their
distance, and how this is evidence for the expansion of the Universe. He
introduces the Cosmological Principle, that the universe is isotropic and
homogeneous. He then tells the story behind the discovery of the cosmic
microwave background by Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson in 1965.[3] After
giving the reader a basis of understanding of astrophysics and particle
physics, in chapter 5, Weinberg lays out the makeup of the Universe after
its origin in a series of frozen frames. Weinberg shows how the Big Bang
can account for the relative abundance of Hydrogen and Helium in the
universe.
So, in other words, you're visualizing short, expanding strings and
"assuming" they go on forever. You're not actually "seeing" eternity, you're
limiting it to the breadth, width and length of finite "strings." Humans are
limited in time and space so we can't "see" (visualize) eternity or
infinity, we have to believe in it by faith.
But in response to Weinberg, if the universe (or "Universe" as Weinberg
capitalizes it?) is constantly expanding, what is it expanding into?
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.