Sujet : Re: Workstation Aesthetics
De : joelcrump (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Joel)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 30. Jun 2024, 12:25:48
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <ohc28jhpfpbbtetcv9ce6ivs1uqg86unp5@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
RabidPedagog <
rabid@pedag.og> wrote:
I find the idea, that [U.S. Vice President] Kamala [Harris] is unqualified, to be blatant anti-black
racism. What is so lacking in her?
>
She can't complete a coherent sentence.
She's an attorney and the vice president. For God's sake, how is this
not either racism, sexism, or really both at once?
-- Joel W. CrumpAmendment XIVSection 1.[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.
Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.