Re: Linux 6.11

Liste des GroupesRevenir à ol advocacy 
Sujet : Re: Linux 6.11
De : sc (at) *nospam* fiat-linux.fr (Stéphane CARPENTIER)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date : 28. Sep 2024, 10:57:25
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Mulots' Killer
Message-ID : <66f7c4f5$0$3260$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
User-Agent : slrn/pre1.0.4-9 (Linux)
Le 22-09-2024, Cy DeMillion <cyde@loozers.net> a écrit :
On 22 Sep 2024 21:06:15 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
>
 
What do YOU do?
 
Don't change the subject. You are speaking about yourself. What I do is
irrelevant to believing in your claims.
>
Incorrect.

Certainly not. You claim you contribute to cooledit project. As long as
I don't see any comment on it's github project from the author, I won't
believe it. Your contribution to this project isn't related with my
contribution to FOSS.

The spirit of FOSS demands that users contribute in every way in which
they are able.  That could be patches, bug reports, comments, etc.

There is nut such a thing as a spirit of FOSS. There are people using,
promoting, contributing, whatever, FOSS projects. And there are as
many spirits as there are people.

But YOU do not contribute.

Once again, you are speaking on your contributions, which are not
related with my contributions.

You are just a selfish user with a big, fat, useless mouth.

You knows nothing about me, but whatever I am, it doesn't change what
you do and what you claim.

FOSS does not need YOU,

So, you mean it's a good thing if I don't contribute as your claims? So
everything about me and what I do is perfect from your perspective and
you can return to the subject of your claims?

but if does need ME.

As a developer, FOSS needs you as far away as possible as any FOSS
project. As you are unable to produce any line of code, FOSS projects
certainly don't need any not understood copy/paste code from questions
on stack overflow you can provide without correction.

And for the promotion part, as you only give arguments to DFS to
criticize the FOSS users/projects, you should stop. It would be the best
thing you could do for FOSS project. It would be less fun from my point
of view but it would be better for FOSS. You see? I'm not that selfish,
I can accept to have less fun if it's good for FOSS.

--
Si vous avez du temps à perdre :
https://scarpet42.gitlab.io

Date Sujet#  Auteur
19 Sep 24 * Linux 6.11121vallor
19 Sep 24 +* Re: Linux 6.115DFS
1 Oct05:39 i`* Re: Linux 6.114Joel
1 Oct05:46 i `* Re: Linux 6.113DFS
1 Oct06:00 i  +- Re: Linux 6.111Joel
1 Oct16:00 i  `- Re: Linux 6.111vallor
20 Sep 24 +- Re: Linux 6.111Lawrence D'Oliveiro
20 Sep 24 `* Re: Linux 6.11114Cy DeMillion
21 Sep 24  `* Re: Linux 6.11113vallor
21 Sep 24   `* Re: Linux 6.11112Diego Garcia
21 Sep 24    `* Re: Linux 6.11111Diego Garcia
21 Sep 24     `* Re: Linux 6.11110vallor
21 Sep 24      `* Re: Linux 6.11109Lester Thorpe
22 Sep 24       `* Re: Linux 6.11108vallor
22 Sep 24        +* Re: Linux 6.1149Stéphane CARPENTIER
22 Sep 24        i`* Re: Linux 6.1148Lester Thorpe
22 Sep 24        i +* Re: Linux 6.1141DFS
23 Sep 24        i i+* Re: Linux 6.1138Lawrence D'Oliveiro
23 Sep 24        i ii+* Re: Linux 6.1133DFS
23 Sep 24        i iii+* Re: Linux 6.1120Joel
24 Sep 24        i iiii`* Re: Linux 6.1119DFS
24 Sep 24        i iiii `* Re: Linux 6.1118Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Sep 24        i iiii  +* Re: Linux 6.119DFS
30 Sep09:35        i iiii  i`* Re: Linux 6.118Lawrence D'Oliveiro
1 Oct05:41        i iiii  i `* Re: Linux 6.117DFS
1 Oct06:06        i iiii  i  `* Re: Linux 6.116Joel
1 Oct15:40        i iiii  i   `* Re: Linux 6.115DFS
1 Oct17:06        i iiii  i    `* Re: Linux 6.114Joel
1 Oct22:33        i iiii  i     `* Re: Linux 6.113DFS
2 Oct00:14        i iiii  i      +- Re: Linux 6.111Joel
2 Oct04:46        i iiii  i      `- Re: Linux 6.111rbowman
25 Sep 24        i iiii  `* Re: Linux 6.118Chris Ahlstrom
25 Sep20:50        i iiii   `* Re: Linux 6.117candycanearter07
25 Sep22:09        i iiii    +* Re: Linux 6.114Chris Ahlstrom
26 Sep02:10        i iiii    i+* Re: Linux 6.112candycanearter07
26 Sep03:02        i iiii    ii`- Re: Linux 6.111Joel
26 Sep03:17        i iiii    i`- Re: Linux 6.111rbowman
28 Sep11:04        i iiii    `* Re: Linux 6.112Stéphane CARPENTIER
28 Sep11:09        i iiii     `- Re: Linux 6.111Joel
23 Sep 24        i iii+* Re: Linux 6.1110rbowman
24 Sep 24        i iiii`* Re: Linux 6.119Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Sep 24        i iiii +* Re: Linux 6.116rbowman
24 Sep 24        i iiii i`* Re: Linux 6.115Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Sep 24        i iiii i +* Re: Linux 6.113rbowman
30 Sep09:38        i iiii i i`* Re: Linux 6.112Lawrence D'Oliveiro
30 Sep21:02        i iiii i i `- Re: Linux 6.111rbowman
25 Sep 24        i iiii i `- Re: Linux 6.111DFS
24 Sep 24        i iiii `* Re: Linux 6.112vallor
24 Sep 24        i iiii  `- Re: Linux 6.111rbowman
24 Sep 24        i iii`* Re: Linux 6.112Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Sep 24        i iii `- Re: Linux 6.111Joel
23 Sep 24        i ii`* Re: Linux 6.114vallor
24 Sep 24        i ii +- Re: Linux 6.111Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Sep 24        i ii `* Re: Linux 6.112Lester Thorpe
24 Sep 24        i ii  `- Re: Linux 6.111Joel
29 Sep04:17        i i`* Re: Linux 6.112Joel
29 Sep21:00        i i `- Re: Linux 6.111DFS
22 Sep 24        i `* Re: Linux 6.116Stéphane CARPENTIER
23 Sep 24        i  +* Re: Linux 6.113vallor
23 Sep 24        i  i`* Re: Linux 6.112%
23 Sep 24        i  i `- Re: Linux 6.111vallor
23 Sep 24        i  +- Re: Linux 6.111DFS
28 Sep10:57        i  `- Re: Linux 6.111Stéphane CARPENTIER
22 Sep 24        +* Re: Linux 6.116DFS
22 Sep 24        i`* Re: Linux 6.115DFS
23 Sep 24        i `* Re: Linux 6.114Lawrence D'Oliveiro
23 Sep 24        i  `* Re: Linux 6.113DFS
24 Sep 24        i   `* Re: Linux 6.112Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Sep 24        i    `- Re: Linux 6.111DFS
22 Sep 24        `* Re: Linux 6.1152vallor
22 Sep 24         +- Re: Linux 6.111%
22 Sep 24         +- Re: Linux 6.111Stéphane CARPENTIER
22 Sep 24         +* Re: Linux 6.1142Lester Thorpe
28 Sep10:41         i`* Re: Linux 6.1141Stéphane CARPENTIER
29 Sep09:56         i `* Re: Linux 6.1140RonB
29 Sep10:02         i  +- Re: Linux 6.111vallor
29 Sep10:17         i  `* Re: Linux 6.1138Stéphane CARPENTIER
29 Sep11:06         i   +* Re: Linux 6.1136vallor
29 Sep11:19         i   i+* Re: Linux 6.1121Joel
29 Sep12:20         i   ii+* Re: Linux 6.112vallor
29 Sep12:42         i   iii`- Re: Linux 6.111Joel
29 Sep14:56         i   ii`* Re: Linux 6.1118Stéphane CARPENTIER
29 Sep20:07         i   ii `* Re: Linux 6.1117Joel
29 Sep20:20         i   ii  `* Re: Linux 6.1116Stéphane CARPENTIER
29 Sep20:44         i   ii   +* Re: Linux 6.116Joel
29 Sep21:50         i   ii   i+* Re: Linux 6.112Stéphane CARPENTIER
29 Sep23:28         i   ii   ii`- Re: Linux 6.111Joel
30 Sep19:31         i   ii   i`* Re: Linux 6.113%
1 Oct02:55         i   ii   i +- Re: Linux 6.111Joel
1 Oct04:29         i   ii   i `- Re: Linux 6.111Joel
30 Sep02:40         i   ii   +- Re: Linux 6.111Joel
30 Sep08:38         i   ii   `* Re: Linux 6.118RonB
1 Oct04:34         i   ii    +- Re: Linux 6.111Joel
1 Oct04:40         i   ii    +* Re: Linux 6.112Joel
1 Oct17:10         i   ii    i`- Re: Linux 6.111%
1 Oct08:36         i   ii    `* Re: Linux 6.114RonB
1 Oct09:00         i   ii     +- Re: Linux 6.111Joel
1 Oct14:52         i   ii     `* Re: Linux 6.112Joel
1 Oct20:26         i   ii      `- Re: Linux 6.111rbowman
29 Sep12:29         i   i`* Re: Linux 6.1114Lester Thorpe
29 Sep12:45         i   i +- Re: Linux 6.111Joel
29 Sep13:17         i   i +- Re: Linux 6.111Chris Ahlstrom
29 Sep15:06         i   i `* Re: Linux 6.1111Stéphane CARPENTIER
29 Sep19:10         i   `- Re: Linux 6.111RonB
23 Sep 24         `* Re: Linux 6.117DFS

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal