Re: Linux 6.11

Le 29-09-2024, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> a écrit :

>
Yet, you posted this:
>
https://i.imgur.com/fUXvwdR.png

As unlike your claim of using your brain about the subject, you refuse
to used your brain to understand what's explained to you, I'll answer
that just once.

For a start, I don't know what he posted and I don't care. When you sent
this message, did you want to be read and understood? If no, good job
keep going like this. If yes, you loose. I don't know what's behind your
link and I don't care. So if you want me to know it, you put text in
your message, not a screenshot of text. I do what I want and you do what
you want. So the mater is only about you wanting your arguments taking
into account or not. With your way, I don't know you argument, I don't
care about your argument and I'll still consider you being plain wrong
without any more argument.

So, it's your choice. I don't care. You are the one sending an unread
argument, you are the one loosing your time.

Isn't my use of images of text, "a matter of taste"?

It's a broader issue than that. Some issues have been told, some I don't
know cause my FAI doesn't provide me every sent messages. I'll tell you,
this only time. You do what you want with it, I don't care. You are
completely wrong, you can stay like that.

First of all, the screenshot of a text has no added value compared with
the text directly displayed. So the screenshot brings nothing good to
the readers. Only bad things which I'll say.

The choice of a usenet reader is a matter of taste. Now, as usenet is a
text only media there is no need to have a graphical reader, so using a
terminal to run one is fine.

Now, your screenshot would require me either to change my reader or to
do an extra step to display it. I'm willing to do neither because I
don't see any reason for that. So you try to impose your taste on me and
it's just bad.

The choice of a usenet reader is a matter of taste, so I can chose a
reader which display the text in the way I like. With your screenshot,
you impose me to see the text in the way you like. So, you impose your
taste on me and it's still bad.

To look at your screenshot, I have to go on a website with my IP and
someone else can know what I do and when I do it. So it's bad for my
privacy, and, as there a direct link between the privacy and the
liberty, it's bad for my liberty too. So your way is, guess again: bad.

If I want to try to find an old text message, there are a lot of way to
do it in texts messages. To do it with your screenshot would be, not
impossible cause OCR exist, but very difficult. So it's still bad.

The screenshot takes more bytes than the text directly put. So it's a
waste of energy on purpose. You are polluting just for fun and there is
nothing good with that.

So when you are speaking about modernity, you are only trying to impose
your taste on the readers and it's not a good argument. There are some
times of a screenshot can be a good thing, when it's the same thing as
copying/pasting some text, there aren't. So you are just plain wrong in
every sense on the term. You can stay like that, it's your choice. Now
it will depend if you want your arguments to be taken into account or
not.

--
Si vous avez du temps à perdre :
https://scarpet42.gitlab.io