Re: Linux 6.11

Liste des GroupesRevenir à ol advocacy 
Sujet : Re: Linux 6.11
De : ronb02NOSPAM (at) *nospam* gmail.com (RonB)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date : 29. Sep 2024, 19:36:14
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vdc36e$1qkcp$3@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
User-Agent : slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
On 2024-09-29, Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> wrote:
Le 29-09-2024, Lester Thorpe <lt@gnu.rocks> a écrit :
>
Unlike vim, emacs, and joe, cooledit is a graphical editor with a
complete GUI interface.

TO LESTER: And that's why I like JOE, it DOESN'T have a GUI interface and I
don't want one. I use the Jstar variation, which uses WordStar keystrokes
and keeps my hands on the keyboard's "home" keys, without moving to a mouse
or Function keys. Much faster and more efficient. If I want a GUI "editor"
I'll use a word processor. I also use WordStar 7.0d in DOSBox-X for the same
reason when I want to more easily format my document.

You see? I don't know about joe, but the main reason behind vim and
Emacs is to avoid the mouse. So the GUI is useless. There are some way
in which a mouse is a good way to use an application, but not in text
editors. In half of your messages you say that the GUI is for the inapt
users and you claim the GUI as a good thing in one of the few area it's
the easiest way to avoid the mouse you are promoting the GUI.

Same with JOE for avoiding the mouse. In addition to a jstar variant, JOE
also supports Emacs and and Pico keystrokes, jmac and jpico.

I try to promote cooledit but the narrow-minded, parochial imbeciles
in this group will summarily reject it because it boggles their little
minds.

TO LESTER: I tried cooledit once and I didn't like it. It seemed unnecessarily
convoluted, if I remember correctly. But if you like it, I'm happy for you.
But what makes you think people are "stupid" because they don't prefer YOUR
choice of an editor? I like JOE, but I'm sure not going to call people
"imbeciles" because they don't like it or won't try it. What is it with
control freaks that they always think the only way is THEIR way?

You promoting way is so bad that the only arguments you provide will
convince other who never heard about it to stay as far away of it as
possible.

Agreed. If the argument for cooledit is that you can take graphical
screenshots and insert them into a newsgroup discussion, that sounds like a
good reason NOT to use it. If I want graphics in my documents, I'll use a
word processor.

(Sorry for butting into your conversation, I guess I have Lester Thorpe
killfiled.)

--
“Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy
what has been invented or made by the forces of good.”  —J.R.R. Tolkien

Date Sujet#  Auteur
19 Sep 24 * Linux 6.11121vallor
19 Sep 24 +* Re: Linux 6.115DFS
1 Oct05:39 i`* Re: Linux 6.114Joel
1 Oct05:46 i `* Re: Linux 6.113DFS
1 Oct06:00 i  +- Re: Linux 6.111Joel
1 Oct16:00 i  `- Re: Linux 6.111vallor
20 Sep 24 +- Re: Linux 6.111Lawrence D'Oliveiro
20 Sep 24 `* Re: Linux 6.11114Cy DeMillion
21 Sep 24  `* Re: Linux 6.11113vallor
21 Sep 24   `* Re: Linux 6.11112Diego Garcia
21 Sep 24    `* Re: Linux 6.11111Diego Garcia
21 Sep 24     `* Re: Linux 6.11110vallor
21 Sep 24      `* Re: Linux 6.11109Lester Thorpe
22 Sep 24       `* Re: Linux 6.11108vallor
22 Sep 24        +* Re: Linux 6.1149Stéphane CARPENTIER
22 Sep 24        i`* Re: Linux 6.1148Lester Thorpe
22 Sep 24        i +* Re: Linux 6.1141DFS
23 Sep 24        i i+* Re: Linux 6.1138Lawrence D'Oliveiro
23 Sep 24        i ii+* Re: Linux 6.1133DFS
23 Sep 24        i iii+* Re: Linux 6.1120Joel
24 Sep 24        i iiii`* Re: Linux 6.1119DFS
24 Sep 24        i iiii `* Re: Linux 6.1118Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Sep 24        i iiii  +* Re: Linux 6.119DFS
30 Sep09:35        i iiii  i`* Re: Linux 6.118Lawrence D'Oliveiro
1 Oct05:41        i iiii  i `* Re: Linux 6.117DFS
1 Oct06:06        i iiii  i  `* Re: Linux 6.116Joel
1 Oct15:40        i iiii  i   `* Re: Linux 6.115DFS
1 Oct17:06        i iiii  i    `* Re: Linux 6.114Joel
1 Oct22:33        i iiii  i     `* Re: Linux 6.113DFS
2 Oct00:14        i iiii  i      +- Re: Linux 6.111Joel
2 Oct04:46        i iiii  i      `- Re: Linux 6.111rbowman
25 Sep 24        i iiii  `* Re: Linux 6.118Chris Ahlstrom
25 Sep20:50        i iiii   `* Re: Linux 6.117candycanearter07
25 Sep22:09        i iiii    +* Re: Linux 6.114Chris Ahlstrom
26 Sep02:10        i iiii    i+* Re: Linux 6.112candycanearter07
26 Sep03:02        i iiii    ii`- Re: Linux 6.111Joel
26 Sep03:17        i iiii    i`- Re: Linux 6.111rbowman
28 Sep11:04        i iiii    `* Re: Linux 6.112Stéphane CARPENTIER
28 Sep11:09        i iiii     `- Re: Linux 6.111Joel
23 Sep 24        i iii+* Re: Linux 6.1110rbowman
24 Sep 24        i iiii`* Re: Linux 6.119Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Sep 24        i iiii +* Re: Linux 6.116rbowman
24 Sep 24        i iiii i`* Re: Linux 6.115Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Sep 24        i iiii i +* Re: Linux 6.113rbowman
30 Sep09:38        i iiii i i`* Re: Linux 6.112Lawrence D'Oliveiro
30 Sep21:02        i iiii i i `- Re: Linux 6.111rbowman
25 Sep 24        i iiii i `- Re: Linux 6.111DFS
24 Sep 24        i iiii `* Re: Linux 6.112vallor
24 Sep 24        i iiii  `- Re: Linux 6.111rbowman
24 Sep 24        i iii`* Re: Linux 6.112Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Sep 24        i iii `- Re: Linux 6.111Joel
23 Sep 24        i ii`* Re: Linux 6.114vallor
24 Sep 24        i ii +- Re: Linux 6.111Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Sep 24        i ii `* Re: Linux 6.112Lester Thorpe
24 Sep 24        i ii  `- Re: Linux 6.111Joel
29 Sep04:17        i i`* Re: Linux 6.112Joel
29 Sep21:00        i i `- Re: Linux 6.111DFS
22 Sep 24        i `* Re: Linux 6.116Stéphane CARPENTIER
23 Sep 24        i  +* Re: Linux 6.113vallor
23 Sep 24        i  i`* Re: Linux 6.112%
23 Sep 24        i  i `- Re: Linux 6.111vallor
23 Sep 24        i  +- Re: Linux 6.111DFS
28 Sep10:57        i  `- Re: Linux 6.111Stéphane CARPENTIER
22 Sep 24        +* Re: Linux 6.116DFS
22 Sep 24        i`* Re: Linux 6.115DFS
23 Sep 24        i `* Re: Linux 6.114Lawrence D'Oliveiro
23 Sep 24        i  `* Re: Linux 6.113DFS
24 Sep 24        i   `* Re: Linux 6.112Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Sep 24        i    `- Re: Linux 6.111DFS
22 Sep 24        `* Re: Linux 6.1152vallor
22 Sep 24         +- Re: Linux 6.111%
22 Sep 24         +- Re: Linux 6.111Stéphane CARPENTIER
22 Sep 24         +* Re: Linux 6.1142Lester Thorpe
28 Sep10:41         i`* Re: Linux 6.1141Stéphane CARPENTIER
29 Sep09:56         i `* Re: Linux 6.1140RonB
29 Sep10:02         i  +- Re: Linux 6.111vallor
29 Sep10:17         i  `* Re: Linux 6.1138Stéphane CARPENTIER
29 Sep11:06         i   +* Re: Linux 6.1136vallor
29 Sep11:19         i   i+* Re: Linux 6.1121Joel
29 Sep12:20         i   ii+* Re: Linux 6.112vallor
29 Sep12:42         i   iii`- Re: Linux 6.111Joel
29 Sep14:56         i   ii`* Re: Linux 6.1118Stéphane CARPENTIER
29 Sep20:07         i   ii `* Re: Linux 6.1117Joel
29 Sep20:20         i   ii  `* Re: Linux 6.1116Stéphane CARPENTIER
29 Sep20:44         i   ii   +* Re: Linux 6.116Joel
29 Sep21:50         i   ii   i+* Re: Linux 6.112Stéphane CARPENTIER
29 Sep23:28         i   ii   ii`- Re: Linux 6.111Joel
30 Sep19:31         i   ii   i`* Re: Linux 6.113%
1 Oct02:55         i   ii   i +- Re: Linux 6.111Joel
1 Oct04:29         i   ii   i `- Re: Linux 6.111Joel
30 Sep02:40         i   ii   +- Re: Linux 6.111Joel
30 Sep08:38         i   ii   `* Re: Linux 6.118RonB
1 Oct04:34         i   ii    +- Re: Linux 6.111Joel
1 Oct04:40         i   ii    +* Re: Linux 6.112Joel
1 Oct17:10         i   ii    i`- Re: Linux 6.111%
1 Oct08:36         i   ii    `* Re: Linux 6.114RonB
1 Oct09:00         i   ii     +- Re: Linux 6.111Joel
1 Oct14:52         i   ii     `* Re: Linux 6.112Joel
1 Oct20:26         i   ii      `- Re: Linux 6.111rbowman
29 Sep12:29         i   i`* Re: Linux 6.1114Lester Thorpe
29 Sep12:45         i   i +- Re: Linux 6.111Joel
29 Sep13:17         i   i +- Re: Linux 6.111Chris Ahlstrom
29 Sep15:06         i   i `* Re: Linux 6.1111Stéphane CARPENTIER
29 Sep19:10         i   `- Re: Linux 6.111RonB
23 Sep 24         `* Re: Linux 6.117DFS

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal