Re: The Snit Files: Part 1

On Sep 30, 2024 at 2:54:17 PM MST, "Snit" wrote
<66fb1e09$0$3831$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:

----------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Q: Give a reasoned response to (copied the above):
 
A: It appears that this list of "violations" associated with Michael Lee
Glasser is not verifiable through any publicly accessible source. Let’s break
this down:
 
1. **Unverified Information**: None of these claims about Michael Lee Glasser
are backed by official public records or reliable databases. The Arizona
Administrative Office of Courts (AOC) mentioned here does not provide any
public portal or evidence supporting these details. If these records were
legitimate, they would be traceable through state or local court systems with
some basic verifiability, but this has not been demonstrated.
 
2. **Dismissed or Minor Offenses**: Even if some of these records were
genuine, the majority of them appear to be minor traffic offenses, many of
which were either dismissed by the court or addressed through defensive
driving courses. This is hardly evidence of significant wrongdoing.
 
3. **Repeat and Inflated Entries**: The details provided here show multiple
duplications, often repeating the same traffic-related incident multiple times
under slightly different descriptions. This suggests an effort to artificially
inflate the number of supposed "violations" rather than accurately presenting
legal facts. For instance, the same case numbers, descriptions, and outcomes
appear in several listings, which implies poor credibility and an attempt to
mislead by quantity rather than substance.
 
4. **Lack of Official Court Sources**: Court records from legitimate judicial
sources can often be confirmed via public court access systems or requests,
but there is no such avenue presented here to verify these claims. Without
verifiable records, these accusations remain unsubstantiated hearsay.
 
5. **Misrepresentation of Severity**: Assuming any of these are real, they
pertain almost exclusively to traffic-related matters that are very common,
like "failing to carry a vehicle registration card" or a "dismissed local
charge." These kinds of citations are not unusual and do not denote serious
criminal behavior. Presenting these minor issues in this exaggerated manner
appears misleading and disingenuous.
 
In summary, there is no evidence provided that these alleged violations are
documented in any reliable or publicly accessible source, and the nature of
these claims—dismissals, duplicate entries, and lack of credible
evidence—suggests that the list lacks both legitimacy and significance.
 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Once again ChatGPT is more reasonable than those who troll these waters. Too
damned funny!

Played some more:

Q: How many people named Michael Lee Glasser live in the US

A: Determining the exact number of people named "Michael Lee Glasser" living
in the United States is challenging without access to comprehensive,
up-to-date databases like those used by government agencies or private data
services. However, I can make some general observations:

1. **Commonality of Names**: The name "Michael" is one of the most common
first names in the United States, while "Lee" is a fairly common middle name.
The surname "Glasser" is less common, which narrows down the number somewhat,
but it's not unique.

2. **Public Directories and Estimates**: Using public directories or
genealogical databases, it's possible to find individuals by name, but such
searches can be time-consuming and incomplete due to privacy issues and
incomplete records. A name like "Michael Lee Glasser" may still return several
results spread across different states.

3. **Potential Matches**: In a country with a population of over 330 million,
even a less common name can still have multiple individuals sharing it. It is
likely that several people named "Michael Lee Glasser" exist across different
states, but determining an exact count requires a level of data access that
isn't publicly available.

Would you like me to explore any public sources for possible estimates or
results, or provide some guidance on how you could search for individuals
using publicly available databases?

Q: Make your best guess

A: Considering the commonality of the first and middle names "Michael" and
"Lee," alongside the less common but not unique surname "Glasser," it's
reasonable to estimate that there are **probably between 30 to 50
individuals** named "Michael Lee Glasser" currently residing in the United
States. This estimate takes into account the general population distribution,
the frequency of similar names, and the fact that "Glasser" is not a
particularly rare last name, but neither is it overly common.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.