Re: Linux 6.11

Liste des GroupesRevenir à ol advocacy 
Sujet : Re: Linux 6.11
De : nntp (at) *nospam* fulltermprivacy.com (Phillip Frabott)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date : 01. Oct 2024, 01:42:29
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vdfd15$2e2ub$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1
User-Agent : NewsLeecher v7.0 Final (http://www.newsleecher.com)
In reply to "Lester Thorpe" who wrote the following:

On Mon, 30 Sep 2024 19:05:12 -0000 (UTC), Phillip Frabott wrote:
 
Now I haven't looked at Cooledit myself but I would have to ask what
exact technological issue is Cooledit solving that other software does not
already solve?
 
 
It's a fucking text/programming editor.  What major "innovations"
can any simple text/programming editor bring?  Would you like it
to wash your soiled, shit-stained underwear as well.  Idiot.
 
You are obviously caught up in some bizarre and illusory idealism.
 
Cooledit does the job.  Furthermore, its GUI is dependent only
on X Window libraries and thus is immune to the GTK+/Qt bullshit.
 
Actually, if one uses the Midnight Commander (MC) file manager, then one
is using basal cooledit because the MC edit uses the same code base.
 
Cooledit is not perfect but it is FOSS and thus it depends on contributions
from the FOSS community.
 
But it is quite apparent that you are just another GNU/Linux freeloader who
wants freedom, only as in beer, without giving anything in return.
 
So fuck your idealism.  Any program that does the job of existing programs
is certainly worthy of consideration.
 
 
 
--
Systemd: solving all the problems that you never knew you had.

So to be clear the technological issue that Cooledit tries to solve is that
other editors have a dependency on GTK/Qt and Cooledit doesn't. I'm
understanding that correctly, yes?

I can see that you've had a lot of people against you for Cooledit as I can see
at least 2 weeks of back and forth so I'm going to give you a pass on your
argumentative reply. I'm not trying to argue with you. I'm just wanting to
understand the purpose of Cooledit and what would be the selling point of it for
someone to choose it over something else. Not having to rely on GTK/Qt or any
other X UI framework is a pretty good selling point. Means it can be used on
systems that require minimal X windows deployments with minimal dependencies.
I've never used MC myself so I can't speak to that, but there is probably a good
market for a minimal dependency editor in a GUI system for those who do use a
GUI so that's pretty cool.
Phillip Frabott
----------
- Adam: Is a void really a void if it returns?
- Jack: No, it's just nullspace at that point.
----------


--
----------------------------------------- --- -- -
Posted with NewsLeecher v7.0 Final
Free Newsreader @ http://www.newsleecher.com/
------------------------------- ----- ---- -- -


Date Sujet#  Auteur
19 Sep 24 * Linux 6.11121vallor
19 Sep 24 +* Re: Linux 6.115DFS
1 Oct05:39 i`* Re: Linux 6.114Joel
1 Oct05:46 i `* Re: Linux 6.113DFS
1 Oct06:00 i  +- Re: Linux 6.111Joel
1 Oct16:00 i  `- Re: Linux 6.111vallor
20 Sep 24 +- Re: Linux 6.111Lawrence D'Oliveiro
20 Sep 24 `* Re: Linux 6.11114Cy DeMillion
21 Sep 24  `* Re: Linux 6.11113vallor
21 Sep 24   `* Re: Linux 6.11112Diego Garcia
21 Sep 24    `* Re: Linux 6.11111Diego Garcia
21 Sep 24     `* Re: Linux 6.11110vallor
21 Sep 24      `* Re: Linux 6.11109Lester Thorpe
22 Sep 24       `* Re: Linux 6.11108vallor
22 Sep 24        +* Re: Linux 6.1149Stéphane CARPENTIER
22 Sep 24        i`* Re: Linux 6.1148Lester Thorpe
22 Sep 24        i +* Re: Linux 6.1141DFS
23 Sep 24        i i+* Re: Linux 6.1138Lawrence D'Oliveiro
23 Sep 24        i ii+* Re: Linux 6.1133DFS
23 Sep 24        i iii+* Re: Linux 6.1120Joel
24 Sep 24        i iiii`* Re: Linux 6.1119DFS
24 Sep 24        i iiii `* Re: Linux 6.1118Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Sep 24        i iiii  +* Re: Linux 6.119DFS
30 Sep09:35        i iiii  i`* Re: Linux 6.118Lawrence D'Oliveiro
1 Oct05:41        i iiii  i `* Re: Linux 6.117DFS
1 Oct06:06        i iiii  i  `* Re: Linux 6.116Joel
1 Oct15:40        i iiii  i   `* Re: Linux 6.115DFS
1 Oct17:06        i iiii  i    `* Re: Linux 6.114Joel
1 Oct22:33        i iiii  i     `* Re: Linux 6.113DFS
2 Oct00:14        i iiii  i      +- Re: Linux 6.111Joel
2 Oct04:46        i iiii  i      `- Re: Linux 6.111rbowman
25 Sep 24        i iiii  `* Re: Linux 6.118Chris Ahlstrom
25 Sep20:50        i iiii   `* Re: Linux 6.117candycanearter07
25 Sep22:09        i iiii    +* Re: Linux 6.114Chris Ahlstrom
26 Sep02:10        i iiii    i+* Re: Linux 6.112candycanearter07
26 Sep03:02        i iiii    ii`- Re: Linux 6.111Joel
26 Sep03:17        i iiii    i`- Re: Linux 6.111rbowman
28 Sep11:04        i iiii    `* Re: Linux 6.112Stéphane CARPENTIER
28 Sep11:09        i iiii     `- Re: Linux 6.111Joel
23 Sep 24        i iii+* Re: Linux 6.1110rbowman
24 Sep 24        i iiii`* Re: Linux 6.119Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Sep 24        i iiii +* Re: Linux 6.116rbowman
24 Sep 24        i iiii i`* Re: Linux 6.115Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Sep 24        i iiii i +* Re: Linux 6.113rbowman
30 Sep09:38        i iiii i i`* Re: Linux 6.112Lawrence D'Oliveiro
30 Sep21:02        i iiii i i `- Re: Linux 6.111rbowman
25 Sep 24        i iiii i `- Re: Linux 6.111DFS
24 Sep 24        i iiii `* Re: Linux 6.112vallor
24 Sep 24        i iiii  `- Re: Linux 6.111rbowman
24 Sep 24        i iii`* Re: Linux 6.112Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Sep 24        i iii `- Re: Linux 6.111Joel
23 Sep 24        i ii`* Re: Linux 6.114vallor
24 Sep 24        i ii +- Re: Linux 6.111Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Sep 24        i ii `* Re: Linux 6.112Lester Thorpe
24 Sep 24        i ii  `- Re: Linux 6.111Joel
29 Sep04:17        i i`* Re: Linux 6.112Joel
29 Sep21:00        i i `- Re: Linux 6.111DFS
22 Sep 24        i `* Re: Linux 6.116Stéphane CARPENTIER
23 Sep 24        i  +* Re: Linux 6.113vallor
23 Sep 24        i  i`* Re: Linux 6.112%
23 Sep 24        i  i `- Re: Linux 6.111vallor
23 Sep 24        i  +- Re: Linux 6.111DFS
28 Sep10:57        i  `- Re: Linux 6.111Stéphane CARPENTIER
22 Sep 24        +* Re: Linux 6.116DFS
22 Sep 24        i`* Re: Linux 6.115DFS
23 Sep 24        i `* Re: Linux 6.114Lawrence D'Oliveiro
23 Sep 24        i  `* Re: Linux 6.113DFS
24 Sep 24        i   `* Re: Linux 6.112Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Sep 24        i    `- Re: Linux 6.111DFS
22 Sep 24        `* Re: Linux 6.1152vallor
22 Sep 24         +- Re: Linux 6.111%
22 Sep 24         +- Re: Linux 6.111Stéphane CARPENTIER
22 Sep 24         +* Re: Linux 6.1142Lester Thorpe
28 Sep10:41         i`* Re: Linux 6.1141Stéphane CARPENTIER
29 Sep09:56         i `* Re: Linux 6.1140RonB
29 Sep10:02         i  +- Re: Linux 6.111vallor
29 Sep10:17         i  `* Re: Linux 6.1138Stéphane CARPENTIER
29 Sep11:06         i   +* Re: Linux 6.1136vallor
29 Sep11:19         i   i+* Re: Linux 6.1121Joel
29 Sep12:20         i   ii+* Re: Linux 6.112vallor
29 Sep12:42         i   iii`- Re: Linux 6.111Joel
29 Sep14:56         i   ii`* Re: Linux 6.1118Stéphane CARPENTIER
29 Sep20:07         i   ii `* Re: Linux 6.1117Joel
29 Sep20:20         i   ii  `* Re: Linux 6.1116Stéphane CARPENTIER
29 Sep20:44         i   ii   +* Re: Linux 6.116Joel
29 Sep21:50         i   ii   i+* Re: Linux 6.112Stéphane CARPENTIER
29 Sep23:28         i   ii   ii`- Re: Linux 6.111Joel
30 Sep19:31         i   ii   i`* Re: Linux 6.113%
1 Oct02:55         i   ii   i +- Re: Linux 6.111Joel
1 Oct04:29         i   ii   i `- Re: Linux 6.111Joel
30 Sep02:40         i   ii   +- Re: Linux 6.111Joel
30 Sep08:38         i   ii   `* Re: Linux 6.118RonB
1 Oct04:34         i   ii    +- Re: Linux 6.111Joel
1 Oct04:40         i   ii    +* Re: Linux 6.112Joel
1 Oct17:10         i   ii    i`- Re: Linux 6.111%
1 Oct08:36         i   ii    `* Re: Linux 6.114RonB
1 Oct09:00         i   ii     +- Re: Linux 6.111Joel
1 Oct14:52         i   ii     `* Re: Linux 6.112Joel
1 Oct20:26         i   ii      `- Re: Linux 6.111rbowman
29 Sep12:29         i   i`* Re: Linux 6.1114Lester Thorpe
29 Sep12:45         i   i +- Re: Linux 6.111Joel
29 Sep13:17         i   i +- Re: Linux 6.111Chris Ahlstrom
29 Sep15:06         i   i `* Re: Linux 6.1111Stéphane CARPENTIER
29 Sep19:10         i   `- Re: Linux 6.111RonB
23 Sep 24         `* Re: Linux 6.117DFS

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal