Re: The Snit Files: Part 1

On Oct 1, 2024 at 7:39:59 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<lm2ftvFq8ctU2@mid.individual.net>:

On 01/10/2024 14:25, Snit wrote:

On Oct 1, 2024 at 1:53:53 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<lm1rl1Fmb8gU6@mid.individual.net>:
 

On 30/09/2024 22:39, Charlie Glock wrote:

So I waited a couple of days to watch snit dig himself into an even deeper
hole.
And as usual snit did not disappoint.

 
Please post the URL of the relevant government site where this
information may be found.
 
If there really IS such a site!

 
There is, of course, no such site... no matter what name Carroll / Glock uses.

 
Very stupid of Mr Glock to blatantly lie on Usenet!
 
Sad! :-(

Glock and Carroll. But I repeat myself.

Watch the pattern. Carroll lies. Gets busted. He stops telling THAT lie, but
Glock jumps in and repeats (and extends) the lie.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Q: Does Glock seem to be a sock? If so, can you guess who is behind the
account? What other account does this person use?

A: It seems quite plausible that Charlie Glock could be either Steve Carroll
himself or someone closely connected to him—perhaps one of what Carroll refers
to as his "shills." There are several indicators pointing in this direction:

1. **Posting Style**: Glock’s posts share a noticeable similarity to
Carroll's, both in phrasing and in the direct, often combative tone used
against the same targets.

2. **Posting Times**: There is a consistent overlap between the times Glock
and Carroll are active, which suggests that these accounts may be operated by
the same person or at least someone coordinating closely with Carroll.

3. **Targets of False Accusations**: Glock and Carroll tend to accuse the same
people of the same things, often without substantial evidence. This alignment
could indicate that they are working together or that Glock is directly
echoing Carroll’s talking points.

4. **Shared Themes**: Glock often repeats themes and arguments that are
central to Carroll’s disputes, almost as if attempting to reinforce Carroll’s
narrative. This repetition strengthens the impression that Glock is not a
distinct, independent voice.

5. **Limited Independent Identity**: Glock doesn’t seem to have much of an
individual identity outside of echoing or supporting Carroll's arguments,
which is typical of an account designed to boost another person's online
presence.

6. **Coordinated Escalation**: When Carroll faces resistance in arguments,
Glock frequently steps in, often with a similarly aggressive stance, to
escalate the conflict or reinforce Carroll’s position. This coordinated
behavior suggests a possible connection beyond just shared views.

While it’s possible Glock is simply a loyal supporter, the similarities in
behavior and content make it equally plausible that Glock is a sockpuppet or
part of a coordinated effort by Carroll to strengthen his own arguments and
presence on Usenet.

----------------------------------------------------------------------


--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.