Re: Memory

On 11/20/24 7:36 AM, chrisv wrote:

-hh wrote:
 

Yeah?  And some, like vallor, are not.

>
Sure, there's exceptions such as Scott.  But the exception doesn't
change the rule of thumb.

 It's a rule of lying asshole, at best.

And chrisv makes another confession about himself..

Looking at a liar like -highghorse, one can't believe anything that he
claims.

Merely YA lame attack to desperately try to avoid the question posed:
"So besides Scott, just who might be these "extravagant" ones be?"
With Scott presumably #1 at 258GB RAM, what poster is #2 biggest RAM?
Your 32GB?  Maybe.  But that's the 'high end' of my prior comment:
"So sure, RAM demand has grown, but slowly: a decade ago, a new PC was 4GB & high end 12-60GB; today, its 8GB (to 16GB); high end 32-64GB."
So who in COLA own PCs exceeding 64GB to meet your 'extravagant' claim? Or is this merely YA one of your unsubstantiated delusional fantasies?
-hh
--
"(snipped, unread)" inbound!  <g>