Re: Two points

Liste des GroupesRevenir à ol advocacy 
Sujet : Re: Two points
De : joelcrump (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Joel)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date : 29. Nov 2024, 17:00:27
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <b8pjkjhs0lq7idq66r34ffc9rfu2v0q5u5@4ax.com>
References : 1
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:

Two points:
>
1) It's surprisingly easy to get the Hurd running in a
virtual machine with kvm:
>
$ uname -a
GNU hurd 0.9 GNU-Mach 1.8+git20240714-up-amd64/Hurd-0.9 x86_64 GNU


Interesting.


2) I own two Mac mini's, which are sitting in a drawer.  They
were made from notebook equipment, and they are crap.
>
One of them came with 4GB of RAM, and ran like a dog.  Thankfully,
I could add more (notebook) RAM, bringing it up to 16GB.  Then
it ran acceptably, probably because it was caching the slow, slow
drive it came with.
>
So we have a Mac Studio now, which is a low-end UNIX workstation.
They aren't cheap, with a price on the order of magnitude of what
I paid for my Linux workstation.
>
Eyeballing the results, it looks like it renders Fooocus images about 1/4
the speed of my Linux workstation.  I thought it would be a lot
faster, but I guess pytorch doesn't support hw acceleration yet -- or
the hardware on the Mac is no match for an RTX 3090ti w/24G of memory.
>
You can say what you want, but I'd much rather use my Thelio
than the Mac Studio.  YMMV.


Fuck Apple.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
29 Nov 24 * Two points26vallor
29 Nov 24 +- Re: Two points1Joel
29 Nov 24 `* Re: Two points24Lawrence D'Oliveiro
1 Dec 24  +* Re: Two points20-hh
2 Dec 24  i`* Re: Two points19Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2 Dec 24  i +* Re: Two points17-hh
2 Dec 24  i i`* Re: Two points16Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2 Dec 24  i i +* Re: Two points2rbowman
2 Dec 24  i i i`- Re: Two points1Joel
2 Dec 24  i i `* Re: Two points13-hh
3 Dec 24  i i  `* Re: Two points12Lawrence D'Oliveiro
3 Dec 24  i i   +* Re: Two points7-hh
3 Dec 24  i i   i`* Re: Two points6Lawrence D'Oliveiro
3 Dec 24  i i   i `* Re: Two points5-hh
3 Dec 24  i i   i  `* Re: Two points4Lawrence D'Oliveiro
3 Dec 24  i i   i   `* Re: Two points3-hh
5 Dec 24  i i   i    `* Re: Two points2DFS
5 Dec 24  i i   i     `- Re: Two points1-hh
3 Dec 24  i i   `* Re: Two points4candycanearter07
3 Dec 24  i i    `* Re: Two points3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
3 Dec 24  i i     +- Re: Two points1DFS
3 Dec 24  i i     `- Re: Two points1candycanearter07
2 Dec 24  i `- Re: Two points1Joel
2 Dec 24  `* Re: Two points3vallor
2 Dec 24   +- Re: Two points1rbowman
3 Dec 24   `- Re: Two points1Lawrence D'Oliveiro

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal