Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025

On 2024-12-22, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:

Le 2024-12-22 à 00:41, RonB a écrit :

On 2024-12-21, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:

Le 2024-12-21 à 17:42, RonB a écrit :

On 2024-12-21, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:

Le 2024-12-21 à 02:47, RonB a écrit :

On 2024-12-20, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:

Le 2024-12-20 à 16:57, Stéphane CARPENTIER a écrit :

Le 20-12-2024, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> a écrit :

Le 2024-12-20 à 15:37, Stéphane CARPENTIER a écrit :

Le 20-12-2024, RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> a écrit :

>
Open source is not profit driven.

>
Tell that to Red Hat.

>
It's the support not the software that makes Red Hat money.

>
Not only. With the support comes some tools developed by Red Hat. There
is no clear cut between the part in Red Hat that makes money and the
part in Red Hat that contributes to open source. The part that
contribute to open source help them to make money with the parts that
sell support. And the part that makes money with support help them to
pay for the part that contribute to open source. You wouldn't have one
without the other.

>
You might be right, I'll concede that much. I just know that I would
never use anything either IBM or Red Hat makes through the pedophile
fruitcakes they employ.

>
But the "pedophile fruitcakes" are a-okay at Microsoft?

>
Microsoft hires progressives, but not pedophiles. Pedophiles are too
busy trying to get dates with 13-year-olds using ElementaryOS to get the
university degrees necessary to get hired at Microsoft.

>
Right. And it's "nice" that you believe that about Microsoft's Woke
"progressives." (They're fuzzy and warm, unlike the Woke "progressives" in
the Linux world. This transgender crap has one purpose, to give kids the
"right" to make their own sexual decisions so pedophile perverts can have
sex with kids.) Funny how people can shunt their brains when they become
fanboi partisans for a specific product.

>
I'm not saying that the pedophiles at Microsoft are any more moral than
the ones in the Linux world; I'm saying that they are at the very least
university graduates. The work Microsoft demands from them also doesn't
afford them much time to diddle children whereas open-source developers
have lots of free time because they usually make their own schedules.

 
Bullshit. Universities are where this Woke bullshit brainwashing is
inculcated. If you really think Microsoft is "superior" because they (may)
have more college graduates, then you're more deluded than I thought.

>
That might be true today, but the woke garbage didn't have its place in
university when I was there. It was always easy to spot the progressive
broad and unless she was very attractive and we wanted to sleep with
her, we just ignored everything she had to say as the world should.
Progressive women are up there with negroes as the stupidest human
beings alive.

It's been true for decades. My uncle was a dissertation short of a PhD and
my father rightly made the observation that all his intelligence was
"educated out of him."

I have no idea about "Progressive" (Woke) women. I never wanted to sleep
with anyone I wasn't married to.

And if you think Microsoft's demands on their employees are more intense
than what pressure Open Source developer's put on themselves than I'm
guessing you've never really seen an American corporation "at work." A LOT
of wasted resources. A lot of wasted time, and at a lot of stupid meetings.

>
There are meetings in every field including Education. Part of why
meetings are necessary is because anyone working in a place like
Microsoft or Google needs to be reminded that they are working with
others and that they are sharing resources. As such, if a child-fondler
decides that he can write a component alone, not provide any comments
and demand that his superiors just "trust him" on the quality of his
code, it won't fly. What one does needs to be comprehensible to the
other. That's why there is consistency in code like what Apple is
selling to consumers. That's why one component in Windows works well
with the other. It's not all band-aided together the way that it is in
Linux.

Most corporate meetings are a complete waste of time. What they do is enable
gutless managers to "pass the buck," and never make a hard decision on their
own — or even really know what the hell is going on with those he's supposed
to be "managing."

As for Microsoft or Apple "quality," I'm guessing whatever quality you're
getting is from the engineers who ignore the stupid meetings and other crap
the corporate wonks try to saddle them with. I've seen too many of these
nepotistic drones to have any faith in corporate management.

I'm not a Musk fan, but he basically gutted Twitter of its many corporate
wonks. Do you see any major detrimental changes in what's now called X?

--
“Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy
what has been invented or made by the forces of good.”  —J.R.R. Tolkien