Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025

On 12/27/24 5:16 PM, Andrzej Matuch wrote:

On 2024-12-23 19:14, -hh wrote:

On 12/23/24 12:03 PM, CrudeSausage wrote:

Le 2024-12-23 à 06:18, -hh a écrit :
>
< snipped, unread >
>
Go share your Communist gobbledegook with low-IQ ...

>
That's what I'm doing.
>
>

I have no interest in it.

>
Translation:  you're a sore loser.
>

I will only read your posts about technology.

>
Translation:  and you know that you're a sore loser too.

 Every time I remove you from my filter, I end up regretting it. Back in you go.

Which is a public admission that you're surrendering to the fact that you can't stand being reminded of how you're a luzer.
For as has been noted where you've not stepped up:
 > The belief that the White man is responsible for all of society's
 > problems, ...
hh> Because that posture allows you to play the VICTIM card instead
hh> of honestly acknowledging that there's been longstanding
hh> systematic advantages to being white (& male) over others...and
hh> you want to maintain your status quo of being advantaged.
 > ...that blacks are not responsible for any of the issues that
 > consistently surround them, that non-White cultures should be
 > allowed free entry into whichever Western nation and be given
 > continuous welfare, ...
hh> Which you know are fictitious claims, especially since US
hh> immigration policy even since 1964 has highly favored white
hh> Europeans over others: see Chinese Exclusion Act.
 > that Whites should be dead last in the selection process for
 > promotions or positions, that White as a race should be destroyed
 > through the promotion of interbreeding, that homosexuals are
 > oppressed, that homosexuality should get equal representation in
 > media despite being a minuscule fraction of the population, that
 > equality is not sufficient and that society should instead strive
 > for equity...
hh> Because it wasn't because of Equity that the US got CoVid checks? /s
 > ...all of which are meant to destabilize society much like they
 > were during the cultural revolution in China to facilitate entry
 > of Communism.
hh> Destabilizes?  No, that's not what such a policy does; try again.
 > It should also be noted that being reluctant to live in a community
 > with the people mentioned above or their advocates is White supremacy,
 > as is the desire to not be mugged, see your wife raped or your child
 > kidnapped or murdered by those same people. In fact, refusing to
 > allow your taxes to be used to pay for the people above rather than
 > to maintain roads or help out brave men who served your country is
 > also White supremacy.
hh> Or - you're simply trying to redefine what wealth-based 'class' is,
hh> and contriving an excuse for why you shouldn't have to pay a fair
hh> share of taxes to society.
 > RonB is free to disagree with what I said. Let me just say, however,
 > that I am not interested in any of the dozen links you'll send me
 > as a rebuttal. Communism, Communists and useful progressive idiots
 > and their opinions will not change my mind. The more progressive
 > you are, the closer you are to Corky in Life Goes On, except that
 > he seemed like a fun dude.
hh> Typically, I provide links to preemptively STFU lying assholes
hh> and hypocrites;  that you're offended by them shows that it works.
 >> You know ... critical thinking, not propaganda.
 >
 > Like the critical thinking you routinely refuse to do by pasting
 > links rather than expressing your opinion in a comprehensible way.
hh> Not my fault that you only comprehend at a 5th grade reading level.
 > You are free to use your barrage of progressive propaganda as a
 > crutch for the opinion they've inserted into your head, but we
 > are also free to refuse to read any of them because we've already
 > seen your shpiel in 1989 <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JVcbY3Tf_TE&pp=ygUKY29ya3kgcmFwcw%3D%3D>
hh> Whatever deluded fantasy lets you get through the day, snowflake.
hh> BTW, you inevitably don't know (nor care) that Harvard University's
hh> origination of a 'Diversity' policy a century ago was actually
hh> an attempt to restore the Status Quo favoritism for the
hh> traditional protestant while male Anglo Saxons in student
hh> admissions:
hh>
hh> It was done in response to how an "undesirable minority" had
hh> been beating white men on Harvard's --> merits only <-- admissions
hh> test, and had risen to ~20% of the student population.
hh>
hh> I'd provide the cites, but you've claimed to be offended by them...
Plus this week's update is how Elon and Vivek has prompted a civil
war within MAGA on their support for more immigrants on H1-B visas
because Americans are lazy and uneducated...and DJT is supporting
the Tech Bros over his 'American First' base.  Seems that they're
shocked that the face eating leopard has chosen to eat their face.
And one URL, just in case you've entirely missed this week's news:
"Trump sides with tech bosses in Maga fight over immigrant visas"
<https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/clyv7gxp02yo>
TL;DR:  now live with the consequences of who you voted for, MAGA.
-hh