Re: The problem with not owning the software

Liste des GroupesRevenir à ol advocacy 
Sujet : Re: The problem with not owning the software
De : bowman (at) *nospam* montana.com (rbowman)
Groupes : alt.comp.os.windows-11 comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date : 30. Dec 2024, 08:05:27
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <ltev1nFdi94U2@mid.individual.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
User-Agent : Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba)
On Mon, 30 Dec 2024 04:55:20 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:

PostScript was a big deal, back in the day when desktop/workstation
machines had more primitive graphics stacks. EPS was a way of embedding
such graphics in a form that they could be sent to a printer that
understood PostScript, from a machine which did not.

And then there is Ghostscript...  One of our applications that prints
reports sniffs at the document to determine if it's PS, then checks the
configuration of the printer to see if it can handle PS. If not, it spawns
Ghostscript to massage it into something the printer can handle. Great
fun.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
21 Dec 24 * Re: The problem with not owning the software200Mr. Man-wai Chang
23 Dec 24 +* Re: The problem with not owning the software179Mr. Man-wai Chang
24 Dec 24 i`* Re: The problem with not owning the software178Ant
25 Dec 24 i +* Re: The problem with not owning the software176Mr. Man-wai Chang
25 Dec 24 i i+- Re: The problem with not owning the software1Ant
25 Dec 24 i i`* Re: The problem with not owning the software174Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Dec 24 i i `* Re: The problem with not owning the software173Mr. Man-wai Chang
28 Dec 24 i i  +* Re: The problem with not owning the software157Lawrence D'Oliveiro
28 Dec 24 i i  i+- Re: The problem with not owning the software1Mr. Man-wai Chang
28 Dec 24 i i  i`* Re: The problem with not owning the software155rbowman
29 Dec 24 i i  i +* Re: The problem with not owning the software107rbowman
29 Dec 24 i i  i i+* Re: The problem with not owning the software93Ant
29 Dec 24 i i  i ii+* Re: The problem with not owning the software26rbowman
29 Dec 24 i i  i iii`* Re: The problem with not owning the software25Carlos E.R.
29 Dec 24 i i  i iii +* Re: The problem with not owning the software15Frank Slootweg
29 Dec 24 i i  i iii i`* Re: The problem with not owning the software14Carlos E.R.
30 Dec 24 i i  i iii i `* Re: The problem with not owning the software13Frank Slootweg
31 Dec 24 i i  i iii i  `* Re: The problem with not owning the software12Carlos E.R.
31 Dec 24 i i  i iii i   `* Re: The problem with not owning the software11Frank Slootweg
31 Dec 24 i i  i iii i    +* Re: The problem with not owning the software9Chris Ahlstrom
31 Dec 24 i i  i iii i    i+* Re: The problem with not owning the software6rbowman
1 Jan 25 i i  i iii i    ii`* Re: The problem with not owning the software5Chris Ahlstrom
2 Jan 25 i i  i iii i    ii `* Re: The problem with not owning the software4rbowman
2 Jan 25 i i  i iii i    ii  `* Re: The problem with not owning the software3Chris
2 Jan 25 i i  i iii i    ii   `* Re: The problem with not owning the software2rbowman
4 Jan 25 i i  i iii i    ii    `- Re: The problem with not owning the software1Chris
31 Dec 24 i i  i iii i    i`* Re: The problem with not owning the software2Farley Flud
4 Jan 25 i i  i iii i    i `- Re: The problem with not owning the software1DFS
31 Dec 24 i i  i iii i    `- Re: The problem with not owning the software1Carlos E.R.
29 Dec 24 i i  i iii +- Re: The problem with not owning the software1rbowman
29 Dec 24 i i  i iii +- Re: The problem with not owning the software1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
30 Dec 24 i i  i iii +* Re: The problem with not owning the software4-hh
30 Dec 24 i i  i iii i+- Re: The problem with not owning the software1Carlos E.R.
30 Dec 24 i i  i iii i`* Re: The problem with not owning the software2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
30 Dec 24 i i  i iii i `- Re: The problem with not owning the software1rbowman
30 Dec 24 i i  i iii `* Re: The problem with not owning the software3Chris
31 Dec 24 i i  i iii  `* Re: The problem with not owning the software2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
31 Dec 24 i i  i iii   `- Re: The problem with not owning the software1Chris
29 Dec 24 i i  i ii+- Re: The problem with not owning the software1rbowman
29 Dec 24 i i  i ii`* Re: The problem with not owning the software65Frank Slootweg
29 Dec 24 i i  i ii `* Re: The problem with not owning the software64rbowman
30 Dec 24 i i  i ii  `* Re: The problem with not owning the software63-hh
30 Dec 24 i i  i ii   +* Re: The problem with not owning the software3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
30 Dec 24 i i  i ii   i`* Re: The problem with not owning the software2-hh
31 Dec 24 i i  i ii   i `- Re: The problem with not owning the software1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
30 Dec 24 i i  i ii   +* Re: The problem with not owning the software2rbowman
30 Dec 24 i i  i ii   i`- Re: The problem with not owning the software1-hh
30 Dec 24 i i  i ii   `* Re: The problem with not owning the software57Chris
31 Dec 24 i i  i ii    `* Re: The problem with not owning the software56Lawrence D'Oliveiro
1 Jan 25 i i  i ii     `* Re: The problem with not owning the software55Chris
1 Jan 25 i i  i ii      `* Re: The problem with not owning the software54Lawrence D'Oliveiro
1 Jan 25 i i  i ii       +* Re: The problem with not owning the software3DFS
1 Jan 25 i i  i ii       i+- Re: The problem with not owning the software1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2 Jan 25 i i  i ii       i`- Re: The problem with not owning the software1rbowman
2 Jan 25 i i  i ii       +- Re: The problem with not owning the software1rbowman
2 Jan 25 i i  i ii       `* Re: The problem with not owning the software49Paul
2 Jan 25 i i  i ii        +- Re: The problem with not owning the software1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2 Jan 25 i i  i ii        `* Re: The problem with not owning the software47Chris
2 Jan 25 i i  i ii         `* Re: The problem with not owning the software46Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Jan 25 i i  i ii          `* Re: The problem with not owning the software45Chris
4 Jan 25 i i  i ii           `* Re: The problem with not owning the software44Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Jan 25 i i  i ii            +* Re: The problem with not owning the software4Chris
5 Jan 25 i i  i ii            i`* Re: The problem with not owning the software3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
5 Jan 25 i i  i ii            i `* Re: The problem with not owning the software2Chris
5 Jan 25 i i  i ii            i  `- Re: The problem with not owning the software1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Jan 25 i i  i ii            +* Re: The problem with not owning the software10DFS
4 Jan 25 i i  i ii            i+* Re: The problem with not owning the software2vallor
4 Jan 25 i i  i ii            ii`- Re: The problem with not owning the software1Chris Ahlstrom
4 Jan 25 i i  i ii            i`* Re: The problem with not owning the software7DFS
4 Jan 25 i i  i ii            i +* Re: The problem with not owning the software5Stéphane CARPENTIER
4 Jan 25 i i  i ii            i i`* Re: The problem with not owning the software4DFS
4 Jan 25 i i  i ii            i i `* Re: The problem with not owning the software3Stéphane CARPENTIER
5 Jan 25 i i  i ii            i i  `* The Desktop Environment (was: Re: The problem with not owning the software)2vallor
5 Jan 25 i i  i ii            i i   `- Re: The Desktop Environment (was: Re: The problem with not owning the software)1pothead
4 Jan 25 i i  i ii            i `- Re: The problem with not owning the software1rbowman
4 Jan 25 i i  i ii            +* Re: The problem with not owning the software28Frank Slootweg
4 Jan 25 i i  i ii            i`* Re: The problem with not owning the software27Sn!pe
5 Jan 25 i i  i ii            i `* Re: The problem with not owning the software26Lawrence D'Oliveiro
5 Jan 25 i i  i ii            i  +* Re: The problem with not owning the software14Chris
5 Jan 25 i i  i ii            i  i+- Re: The problem with not owning the software1Sn!pe
5 Jan 25 i i  i ii            i  i`* Re: The problem with not owning the software12Lawrence D'Oliveiro
5 Jan 25 i i  i ii            i  i `* Re: The problem with not owning the software11Chris
6 Jan 25 i i  i ii            i  i  `* Re: The problem with not owning the software10Lawrence D'Oliveiro
6 Jan 25 i i  i ii            i  i   `* Re: The problem with not owning the software9Chris
6 Jan 25 i i  i ii            i  i    `* Re: The problem with not owning the software8Lawrence D'Oliveiro
7 Jan 25 i i  i ii            i  i     `* Re: The problem with not owning the software7Chris
7 Jan 25 i i  i ii            i  i      `* Re: The problem with not owning the software6Lawrence D'Oliveiro
7 Jan 25 i i  i ii            i  i       +- Re: The problem with not owning the software1rbowman
7 Jan 25 i i  i ii            i  i       `* Re: The problem with not owning the software4Chris
8 Jan03:26 i i  i ii            i  i        `* Re: The problem with not owning the software3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
8 Jan14:28 i i  i ii            i  i         `* Re: The problem with not owning the software2Chris
8 Jan22:28 i i  i ii            i  i          `- Re: The problem with not owning the software1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
5 Jan 25 i i  i ii            i  +* [OT] Re: The problem with not owning the software5Sn!pe
5 Jan 25 i i  i ii            i  i`* Re: [OT] Re: The problem with not owning the software4Lawrence D'Oliveiro
5 Jan 25 i i  i ii            i  i `* Re: [OT] Re: The problem with not owning the software3Sn!pe
5 Jan 25 i i  i ii            i  i  `* Re: [OT] Re: The problem with not owning the software2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
8 Jan18:21 i i  i ii            i  i   `- Re: [OT] Re: The problem with not owning the software1DFS
5 Jan 25 i i  i ii            i  +* [OT] Re: The problem with not owning the software5Sn!pe
5 Jan 25 i i  i ii            i  i+* Re: [OT] Re: The problem with not owning the software3-hh
5 Jan 25 i i  i ii            i  ii`* Re: [OT] Re: The problem with not owning the software2Chris Ahlstrom
5 Jan 25 i i  i ii            i  ii `- Re: [OT] Re: The problem with not owning the software1-hh
5 Jan 25 i i  i ii            i  i`- Re: [OT] Re: The problem with not owning the software1Sn!pe
5 Jan 25 i i  i ii            i  `- Re: The problem with not owning the software1Chris
5 Jan 25 i i  i ii            `- Re: The problem with not owning the software1Paul
29 Dec 24 i i  i i`* Re: The problem with not owning the software13rbowman
29 Dec 24 i i  i +* Re: The problem with not owning the software7rbowman
29 Dec 24 i i  i +- Re: The problem with not owning the software1Ken Blake
29 Dec 24 i i  i +* Re: The problem with not owning the software17-hh
30 Dec 24 i i  i +- Re: The problem with not owning the software1Chris
31 Dec 24 i i  i +- Re: The problem with not owning the software1DFS
1 Jan 25 i i  i +- Re: The problem with not owning the software1Physfitfreak
2 Jan 25 i i  i `* Re: The problem with not owning the software19Chris
31 Dec 24 i i  `* Re: The problem with not owning the software15DFS
25 Dec 24 i `- Re: The problem with not owning the software1Mr. Man-wai Chang
30 Dec 24 +* Re: The problem with not owning the software16Chris
31 Dec 24 `* Re: The problem with not owning the software4DFS

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal