Sujet : Re: The problem with not owning the software
De : ldo (at) *nospam* nz.invalid (Lawrence D'Oliveiro)
Groupes : alt.comp.os.windows-11 comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 31. Dec 2024, 01:56:30
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vkvffu$1sirn$3@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
User-Agent : Pan/0.161 (Chasiv Yar; )
On Mon, 30 Dec 2024 13:01:13 -0500, -hh wrote:
On 12/29/24 11:52 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>
How much data was involved, really? I suspect a more sensible app would
deal with the same data much more efficiently and easily.
There was a pretty modest chunk of data ... maybe just 1000 unique data
points?
What made it large & computationally intensive was that the dataset was
routed iteratively through a ~dozen different "Monte Carlo" statistical
exercises and filters to identify & glean signal from noise.
I’m sure something could be whipped up in Python with NumPy/Pandas/
Matplotlib etc that would go through the same operations much more quickly
and efficiently.
Microsoft is even offering access to these Python toolkits to Excel users
now -- at a cost. You know -- charging for something that the users could
bypass Microsoft and access for free, only they’re too dumb to realize it.