Sujet : Re: The problem with not owning the software
De : sc (at) *nospam* fiat-linux.fr (Stéphane CARPENTIER)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 04. Jan 2025, 21:45:58
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Mulots' Killer
Message-ID : <67799e06$0$12936$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
User-Agent : slrn/pre1.0.4-9 (Linux)
Le 04-01-2025, DFS <
guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> a écrit :
On 1/4/2025 1:01 PM, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
Le 04-01-2025, DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> a écrit :
>
Which Linux distro offers perfect consistency?
First, I'd say it's not the job of the distro. It's the job of the
Window Manager.
Now, the first time I installed Mint for someone else, I installed a few
different WM to show that there is no better WM, there is only a WM
which suit more the user. And they have to be tested to know which one
to chose. I have to say it was disturbing to see they all look similar
and I still don't know if I like it or not.
So, Mint is not perfect, but it's the only one I know which offer real
consistency.
>
Cinnamon desktop?
What I mean is cinnamon is the default desktop. I don't like it, it's a
matter of taste, it's of no concern here. But when I installed xfce,
lxde and enlightenment, they all looked like cinnamon and that was
disturbing. I was hopping to show different ways of using Linux, but
they were so similar, it was like showing the Window Manager is of no
consequence, they can all look the same. So, it was a consistency
brought by the distro, not by the WM.
-- Si vous avez du temps à perdre :https://scarpet42.gitlab.io