Re: The problem with not owning the software

Liste des GroupesRevenir à ol advocacy 
Sujet : Re: The problem with not owning the software
De : nospam (at) *nospam* needed.invalid (Paul)
Groupes : alt.comp.os.windows-11 comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date : 05. Jan 2025, 01:32:32
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vlcjv2$mlb7$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : Ratcatcher/2.0.0.25 (Windows/20130802)
On Fri, 1/3/2025 8:55 AM, Andrzej Matuch wrote:

Installing Windows 11? The installer won't allow you to continue without logging
in to your account. Sure, there are workarounds if you pray five times a day and
stand on your head doing so, but it doesn't allow it be default.

Start with the https://rufus.ie USB stick preparation tool.

   Name: rufus-4.6p.exe                # Portable version
   Size: 1622832 bytes (1584 KiB)
   SHA256: 8279696C1D78B14618500E9135886A3667B9DECC65946F3729002E4BFDBB20AB

Run from Windows machine, to prepare Windows 11 media for clean install to a PC.
If Linux is onboard the target (to-be-installed) machine, make sure you have
prepared a [Linux] Boot Repair CD for later, when Linux needs to be returned to control.

It uses syslinux for the USB boot part, plus it modifies some
of the goods in the Windows 11 materials, for Windows-10-like behavior.
There is a separate dialog box, which only applies when you tell
Rufus (one way or another) that this is a Windows 11 project, that
will appear before the writes to the stick start.

   [Picture]

    https://i.postimg.cc/9Q0kMWTB/Rufus-Boot-Stick-Preparation.gif

Note that, if you are using a Window 11 24H2 ISO, there is a
remote possibility that Rufus will defeat the usual issues,
however, Microsoft has promised the OS will *crash* if the
hardware does not support SSE4.2 POPCNT instruction. I tries on
the Optiplex 780, the E8400 Core2 Duo lacks the instruction, and
a Microsoft dialog stops the install. I don't get to crash.

   [Picture]

    https://i.postimg.cc/X7Pw33gF/optiplex-780-Core2-Duo-W11-Fail.gif

Notice how in that example, I install W10Home first, then while
booted into Windows, I plug in the Rufus stick and run the Setup.exe
file on it. And do a W11-over-W10 installation. Which is a lot
smoother than what I'm about to show you.

If you made media from the 24H2 ISO, and had a perfectly compliant
machine, this is the hay ride you get to take. Starting over, ls likely
to be your fate. Imagine the length of the storyboard and how many
whiteboards it took to put together this customer torture sequence.
Notice on this side-by-side Clean Install of W11Home, my new C:
drive is Bitlocker encrypted. The key for it, will be stored
in my Cloud account at Microsoft, indexed by the new MSA I'm forced
to make.

   [Picture]

    https://i.postimg.cc/XX6BGN1D/W11-24-H2-DVD-Install.gif

*******

Finally, this is the Success Case. W11-over-W10 using Rufus stick Setup.exe .

    [Picture]

     https://i.postimg.cc/T1FGRGJ7/Rufus-W11-Home-24-H2-on-10-year-old-machine.gif

Looks like Disk #33, normally used for Win10, now has a Win11 24H2 dual boot.
Since the processor has a POPCNT, no problem getting the install to work.

   Paul

Date Sujet#  Auteur
21 Dec 24 * Re: The problem with not owning the software200Mr. Man-wai Chang
23 Dec 24 +* Re: The problem with not owning the software179Mr. Man-wai Chang
24 Dec 24 i`* Re: The problem with not owning the software178Ant
25 Dec 24 i +* Re: The problem with not owning the software176Mr. Man-wai Chang
25 Dec 24 i i+- Re: The problem with not owning the software1Ant
25 Dec 24 i i`* Re: The problem with not owning the software174Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Dec 24 i i `* Re: The problem with not owning the software173Mr. Man-wai Chang
28 Dec 24 i i  +* Re: The problem with not owning the software157Lawrence D'Oliveiro
28 Dec 24 i i  i+- Re: The problem with not owning the software1Mr. Man-wai Chang
28 Dec 24 i i  i`* Re: The problem with not owning the software155rbowman
29 Dec 24 i i  i +* Re: The problem with not owning the software107rbowman
29 Dec 24 i i  i i+* Re: The problem with not owning the software93Ant
29 Dec 24 i i  i ii+* Re: The problem with not owning the software26rbowman
29 Dec 24 i i  i iii`* Re: The problem with not owning the software25Carlos E.R.
29 Dec 24 i i  i iii +* Re: The problem with not owning the software15Frank Slootweg
29 Dec 24 i i  i iii i`* Re: The problem with not owning the software14Carlos E.R.
30 Dec 24 i i  i iii i `* Re: The problem with not owning the software13Frank Slootweg
31 Dec 24 i i  i iii i  `* Re: The problem with not owning the software12Carlos E.R.
31 Dec 24 i i  i iii i   `* Re: The problem with not owning the software11Frank Slootweg
31 Dec 24 i i  i iii i    +* Re: The problem with not owning the software9Chris Ahlstrom
31 Dec 24 i i  i iii i    i+* Re: The problem with not owning the software6rbowman
1 Jan 25 i i  i iii i    ii`* Re: The problem with not owning the software5Chris Ahlstrom
2 Jan 25 i i  i iii i    ii `* Re: The problem with not owning the software4rbowman
2 Jan 25 i i  i iii i    ii  `* Re: The problem with not owning the software3Chris
2 Jan 25 i i  i iii i    ii   `* Re: The problem with not owning the software2rbowman
4 Jan 25 i i  i iii i    ii    `- Re: The problem with not owning the software1Chris
31 Dec 24 i i  i iii i    i`* Re: The problem with not owning the software2Farley Flud
4 Jan 25 i i  i iii i    i `- Re: The problem with not owning the software1DFS
31 Dec 24 i i  i iii i    `- Re: The problem with not owning the software1Carlos E.R.
29 Dec 24 i i  i iii +- Re: The problem with not owning the software1rbowman
29 Dec 24 i i  i iii +- Re: The problem with not owning the software1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
30 Dec 24 i i  i iii +* Re: The problem with not owning the software4-hh
30 Dec 24 i i  i iii i+- Re: The problem with not owning the software1Carlos E.R.
30 Dec 24 i i  i iii i`* Re: The problem with not owning the software2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
30 Dec 24 i i  i iii i `- Re: The problem with not owning the software1rbowman
30 Dec 24 i i  i iii `* Re: The problem with not owning the software3Chris
31 Dec 24 i i  i iii  `* Re: The problem with not owning the software2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
31 Dec 24 i i  i iii   `- Re: The problem with not owning the software1Chris
29 Dec 24 i i  i ii+- Re: The problem with not owning the software1rbowman
29 Dec 24 i i  i ii`* Re: The problem with not owning the software65Frank Slootweg
29 Dec 24 i i  i ii `* Re: The problem with not owning the software64rbowman
30 Dec 24 i i  i ii  `* Re: The problem with not owning the software63-hh
30 Dec 24 i i  i ii   +* Re: The problem with not owning the software3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
30 Dec 24 i i  i ii   i`* Re: The problem with not owning the software2-hh
31 Dec 24 i i  i ii   i `- Re: The problem with not owning the software1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
30 Dec 24 i i  i ii   +* Re: The problem with not owning the software2rbowman
30 Dec 24 i i  i ii   i`- Re: The problem with not owning the software1-hh
30 Dec 24 i i  i ii   `* Re: The problem with not owning the software57Chris
31 Dec 24 i i  i ii    `* Re: The problem with not owning the software56Lawrence D'Oliveiro
1 Jan 25 i i  i ii     `* Re: The problem with not owning the software55Chris
1 Jan 25 i i  i ii      `* Re: The problem with not owning the software54Lawrence D'Oliveiro
1 Jan 25 i i  i ii       +* Re: The problem with not owning the software3DFS
1 Jan 25 i i  i ii       i+- Re: The problem with not owning the software1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2 Jan 25 i i  i ii       i`- Re: The problem with not owning the software1rbowman
2 Jan 25 i i  i ii       +- Re: The problem with not owning the software1rbowman
2 Jan 25 i i  i ii       `* Re: The problem with not owning the software49Paul
2 Jan 25 i i  i ii        +- Re: The problem with not owning the software1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2 Jan 25 i i  i ii        `* Re: The problem with not owning the software47Chris
2 Jan 25 i i  i ii         `* Re: The problem with not owning the software46Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Jan 25 i i  i ii          `* Re: The problem with not owning the software45Chris
4 Jan 25 i i  i ii           `* Re: The problem with not owning the software44Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Jan 25 i i  i ii            +* Re: The problem with not owning the software4Chris
5 Jan 25 i i  i ii            i`* Re: The problem with not owning the software3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
5 Jan 25 i i  i ii            i `* Re: The problem with not owning the software2Chris
5 Jan 25 i i  i ii            i  `- Re: The problem with not owning the software1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Jan 25 i i  i ii            +* Re: The problem with not owning the software10DFS
4 Jan 25 i i  i ii            i+* Re: The problem with not owning the software2vallor
4 Jan 25 i i  i ii            ii`- Re: The problem with not owning the software1Chris Ahlstrom
4 Jan 25 i i  i ii            i`* Re: The problem with not owning the software7DFS
4 Jan 25 i i  i ii            i +* Re: The problem with not owning the software5Stéphane CARPENTIER
4 Jan 25 i i  i ii            i i`* Re: The problem with not owning the software4DFS
4 Jan 25 i i  i ii            i i `* Re: The problem with not owning the software3Stéphane CARPENTIER
5 Jan 25 i i  i ii            i i  `* The Desktop Environment (was: Re: The problem with not owning the software)2vallor
5 Jan 25 i i  i ii            i i   `- Re: The Desktop Environment (was: Re: The problem with not owning the software)1pothead
4 Jan 25 i i  i ii            i `- Re: The problem with not owning the software1rbowman
4 Jan 25 i i  i ii            +* Re: The problem with not owning the software28Frank Slootweg
4 Jan 25 i i  i ii            i`* Re: The problem with not owning the software27Sn!pe
5 Jan 25 i i  i ii            i `* Re: The problem with not owning the software26Lawrence D'Oliveiro
5 Jan 25 i i  i ii            i  +* Re: The problem with not owning the software14Chris
5 Jan 25 i i  i ii            i  i+- Re: The problem with not owning the software1Sn!pe
5 Jan 25 i i  i ii            i  i`* Re: The problem with not owning the software12Lawrence D'Oliveiro
5 Jan 25 i i  i ii            i  i `* Re: The problem with not owning the software11Chris
6 Jan 25 i i  i ii            i  i  `* Re: The problem with not owning the software10Lawrence D'Oliveiro
6 Jan 25 i i  i ii            i  i   `* Re: The problem with not owning the software9Chris
6 Jan 25 i i  i ii            i  i    `* Re: The problem with not owning the software8Lawrence D'Oliveiro
7 Jan 25 i i  i ii            i  i     `* Re: The problem with not owning the software7Chris
7 Jan 25 i i  i ii            i  i      `* Re: The problem with not owning the software6Lawrence D'Oliveiro
7 Jan 25 i i  i ii            i  i       +- Re: The problem with not owning the software1rbowman
7 Jan 25 i i  i ii            i  i       `* Re: The problem with not owning the software4Chris
8 Jan03:26 i i  i ii            i  i        `* Re: The problem with not owning the software3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
8 Jan14:28 i i  i ii            i  i         `* Re: The problem with not owning the software2Chris
8 Jan22:28 i i  i ii            i  i          `- Re: The problem with not owning the software1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
5 Jan 25 i i  i ii            i  +* [OT] Re: The problem with not owning the software5Sn!pe
5 Jan 25 i i  i ii            i  i`* Re: [OT] Re: The problem with not owning the software4Lawrence D'Oliveiro
5 Jan 25 i i  i ii            i  i `* Re: [OT] Re: The problem with not owning the software3Sn!pe
5 Jan 25 i i  i ii            i  i  `* Re: [OT] Re: The problem with not owning the software2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
8 Jan18:21 i i  i ii            i  i   `- Re: [OT] Re: The problem with not owning the software1DFS
5 Jan 25 i i  i ii            i  +* [OT] Re: The problem with not owning the software5Sn!pe
5 Jan 25 i i  i ii            i  i+* Re: [OT] Re: The problem with not owning the software3-hh
5 Jan 25 i i  i ii            i  ii`* Re: [OT] Re: The problem with not owning the software2Chris Ahlstrom
5 Jan 25 i i  i ii            i  ii `- Re: [OT] Re: The problem with not owning the software1-hh
5 Jan 25 i i  i ii            i  i`- Re: [OT] Re: The problem with not owning the software1Sn!pe
5 Jan 25 i i  i ii            i  `- Re: The problem with not owning the software1Chris
5 Jan 25 i i  i ii            `- Re: The problem with not owning the software1Paul
29 Dec 24 i i  i i`* Re: The problem with not owning the software13rbowman
29 Dec 24 i i  i +* Re: The problem with not owning the software7rbowman
29 Dec 24 i i  i +- Re: The problem with not owning the software1Ken Blake
29 Dec 24 i i  i +* Re: The problem with not owning the software17-hh
30 Dec 24 i i  i +- Re: The problem with not owning the software1Chris
31 Dec 24 i i  i +- Re: The problem with not owning the software1DFS
1 Jan 25 i i  i +- Re: The problem with not owning the software1Physfitfreak
2 Jan 25 i i  i `* Re: The problem with not owning the software19Chris
31 Dec 24 i i  `* Re: The problem with not owning the software15DFS
25 Dec 24 i `- Re: The problem with not owning the software1Mr. Man-wai Chang
30 Dec 24 +* Re: The problem with not owning the software16Chris
31 Dec 24 `* Re: The problem with not owning the software4DFS

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal