Liste des Groupes | Revenir à ol advocacy |
On 2025-01-04 21:34, Sn!pe wrote:Reminds me of a friend who sends me an email 2x/year that's a copy of the report of the latest chemical analysis from his car's most recent oil change: dude, its fine that you want your car to last, but its not going to be preserved in a museum!Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> wrote:Sure, because Mac users typically don't care how the computer works; they just want to use the software to accomplish something. Checking wear, upgrading and changing components is all beneath them. Those who would wish to do such things are peons.
>On 2025-01-04 19:39, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:[big snip]On Sat, 4 Jan 2025 21:50:21 +0000, Sn!pe wrote:
>>>[OT] That's the great thing about Apple: from the users' viewpoint itUntil it doesn't. Why do you think Mac users feel the need for something
all "just works".
>
like Homebrew? That adds Linux-style package-manager functionality that is
missing from macOS. Because without it, trying to install open-source
software turns into a complete nightmare.
>
I wanted to install something to calculate the wear on my MacBook M1's
storage and experienced this first-hand. It's much easier with Linux.
>
Fair comment. You're in a very small minority for wanting to do this.
Seriously though, I like the Apple-silicon Macs but I'm realizing that I'm not the kind of person who would be content knowing that whatever I purchased can't be changed in the slightest after purchase. I love how easily Apple hardware communicates with other Apple hardware and find MacOS to be a nice system, but I'm realizing that the best compromise for me is Linux delivered by a steady community like that of Fedora.I think what changed for me was recognizing that I no longer need to go through extraordinary efforts to make an PC last a decade anymore, because their costs have declined so dramatically over the past 40 years.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.