Sujet : Re: Why GIMP Is Better Than Photoshop
De : ff (at) *nospam* linux.rocks (Farley Flud)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 05. Jan 2025, 23:10:00
Autres entêtes
Organisation : UsenetExpress - www.usenetexpress.com
Message-ID : <pan$80171$61404c2a$93ffae1c$2971b86d@linux.rocks>
References : 1 2 3
On Sun, 5 Jan 2025 15:51:51 -0500, -hh wrote:
While Feeb is at it, he needs to explain how & why it is significant for
there to be floating point at all, since the input sensor is integer
based: where is this necessary? Because without a clear need, it
sounds more like sloppy/lazy programming and/or false features.
Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha! What a total ignoramus!
A base in integers completely sacrifices any fractional portions
thereof, and therein lies the need for floating point representation.
Check out the global standard, openexr:
https://openexr.com/en/latest/about.htmlPhotoshop is made for marketdroids, like you, that cannot see
their digital hand in front of their digital face.
(The same obtains for all Microslop software.)
The GIMP is made for true scientific professionals.
The case is closed.
No amount of bickering from your ignoramus ass can alter the
reality.
-- Systemd: solving all the problems that you never knew you had.
Why GIMP Is Better Than Photoshop
Re: Why GIMP Is Better Than Photoshop